ShysDad wrote:"Authorities had earlier asked civilian volunteers to avoid the search area, but on Thursday opened the effort to volunteer pilots who may wish to use their own aircraft. Those interested in doing so were asked to first call Smith at 208-382-7319."
This is from the Salt Lake Tribune. Last year when Shy was missing, they would not allow this. I raised HOLY HELL with everybody and apparently they listened. So if anyone is in the area and can lend assistance please do so. The family needs our help and if I was a pilot with an aircraft I would drop everything and go help them...God BLess....

But it cannot be the CAP. The people you need in the air will not join and deal with that organization.

lowflyinG3 wrote:Not formally trained in SAR myself but I feel that a guy that has local Sheriff's department aerial SAR saves documented, 13,000 hours of low altitude experience flying ag, a knowledge of that area from flying all over it for the last nine years, coming up in a Cessna 180 on wheel-skis with another 2.5 hours of fuel on board after the ferry flight could easily be told what freq to talk on and what box to fly in...........
Maybe not though.
M6RV6 wrote:Not that it makes any differance, but I think 2 helo's and 3 fixed wings in that amount of area sure could use some help??
Cary wrote:Exactly what I said, right?I think you'd be surprised how many people are always monitoring guard...primarily airline pilots.
Cary

Nosedragger wrote:As far as training, I'd say someone that spends a lot of time in that area with a stol plane is more trained and useful for this mission than the guy building time in the glass panel CAP skylane. I know how hard it is flying hunters around in mine at 100 mph, making sure not to get in a tight spot, compared to a super cub that can mush along at 50 mph and then climb out of a box canyon. But I can see why they wouldn't want more to deal with, most CAP pilots I know can barely fly, why ask them to avoid other aircraft at the same time? Having an army of volunteers on the ground shouldn't hurt anything, they might luck onto the plane. Would 500 people hiking a 5 mile radius around the area be too many? CAP needs a re-boot.

Blown56 wrote:STOL wrote
With that said I am going to get severe feedback on this observation but................ My gut feeling is there is a huge LDS connection /angle playing out on this crash...... Funny how "they" can mobilze a few hundred people and post a TFR, but most other crashes get a couple of searchers and small blurb in the local paper... IMHO....
Flame suit on.......
You are a genius ,we should all become Mormons and when we crash we will get special service.![]()
Seriously , my prayers go out to them and there family. We picked an unforgiving thing to Love. Even with flight following , talking to salt lake , and a flight plan, there is no gurantee of safety.
whee wrote:lowflyinG3 wrote:Not formally trained in SAR myself but I feel that a guy that has local Sheriff's department aerial SAR saves documented, 13,000 hours of low altitude experience flying ag, a knowledge of that area from flying all over it for the last nine years, coming up in a Cessna 180 on wheel-skis with another 2.5 hours of fuel on board after the ferry flight could easily be told what freq to talk on and what box to fly in...........
Maybe not though.
I agree. I haven't done any SAR but I've done a fair amount of game scouting and searching for lost cattle. I know it is not the same but I tend to think that most of us here spend more time looking at the ground while flying than the CAP guys do. It takes some experience to get good at spotting things from an airplane.
G3, how'd you get in on SAR with your local Sheriff? I'd like to do that here but I'd bet the local sheriff wouldn't allow it. I wanted to join the Bonneville Country SAR team but the rules and requirements were insane for a volunteer organization.

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests