I’ve installed and used two. One on an TSIO 520 in a T210. Other on my current A185F. Very pleased. They work well, and I’ve had no failures. I’d go straight to them if I needed to equip another airplane. I like that the cylinder bands are trying to heat the cylinder bore and the piston inside. Heat probably also migrates to the crank case given the proximity to the heating bands. I also have two sump heaters. My concerns with cold starts is (in order) oil, bearings and then cylinder walls. In particular, clearances between the cylinder and piston. If the engine starts, and the piston expands quickly due to combustion heat, but the barrel stays cold, scuffing could occur. The barrel hasn’t expanded yet, the piston has, and the clearances may be too tight. This is a concern with cold Diesel engines, especially fire trucks, and I’ve transposed it to airplane engines. I may be in error, but that is the basis of my bias.
The alternative is Tanis. I didn’t like their probes that occupied the temperature probe wells, precluding probes for engine monitors in those provisions. Don’t like the hollow bolt idea in the valve cover screws either. I figure the heads on these engines are designed to expel the most heat, and probably do so quite effectively while the Tanis bolt probes are trying to heat them. The heat probably escapes the aluminium fins on the heads before it has a chance to migrate down the steel cylinder. The combustion chamber doesn’t need heat to get the fire started. Again, opinion and bias derived only from imagining the heat path.