c180pilot wrote:Tragic? I may have a unique view on this. Born and raised in Idaho, worked summers thru college fighting fires. A big one I was on was on the Salmon, burned 10000 acres a day for awhile. Can't even really tell where it was now. If the trees burn, they'll grow back. It's kind of a natural process there. Back in the twenties?, I think, idaho had a fire that burned three million acres. My grandpa might have been on that one.

All of it is lush forest now. If people's property burns, I'm sorry about that, but that is one of the risks you take when you buy property in Idaho forest. Hopefully, they can rebuild. Take the long view.
Wayne
I'm with you on a lot of that Wayne. I realize that it's a natural process and that forests are surprisingly resilient and regenerative. I have seen forests miraculously come back to abundance over a relatively short period.
The tragedy, in my opinion, is the loss of historical lodges. If they go down, they will most likely never return.
Could you build out new structures on wilderness in holdings today? If so, I doubt that you could find an insurance policy covering fire damage for a lodge on the lower Salmon, which has fires every year it seems.
It is uncertain to me if any of these lodges were destroyed, but the property upon which they are built appears to have been burned through.
I have heard that Sulphur Creek lodge may be closed to the public indefinitely because of infrastructure problems that resulted from the big fire a couple of years ago.
The Minam River Lodge was threatened by a wildfire burning less than a half mile away last year. Fortunately, it is still standing.
I simply hope that the places that I have been fortunate enough to spend time at with my family and friends remain intact for others well in to the future. The loss of such places is what I would find to be tragic.