The Wittman Buttercup has wing morphing. He designed and built it in the '30s. Wittman claimed 45mph stall and 130mph top speed on 85 horse. That's not terribly impressive on the bottom end but it was an interesting design.
EB
SE6601KF wrote:Awesome plane!!!!!!!!!!!!
Did you notice the guys wearing the masks to load spray on the plane, but the field workers got sprayed.
SE6601KF wrote:Awesome plane!!!!!!!!!!!!
Did you notice the guys wearing the masks to load spray on the plane, but the field workers got sprayed.
Hafast wrote:SE6601KF wrote:Awesome plane!!!!!!!!!!!!
Did you notice the guys wearing the masks to load spray on the plane, but the field workers got sprayed.
Are you back down in Utah for the season?
IndoPilot. wrote:Interesting thread and one close to my heart. It's totally true what's been mentioned about the Porter's range and speed. It's not an aircraft you want to go anywhere too far in a hurry in! However, if you have about 8-900kgs of cargo you want taken into a short, unprepared mountain airstrip about 70-100nm away, then it's perfect and you won't find a better suited aircraft. The Kodiak and PAC-750 are good but neither can match the Porter's climb rate or short take-off roll. And when it comes to steep sloping, unprepared strips, tailwheel wins every time for me.

58Skylane wrote:Clay Lacy behind the yoke of his Pilatus PC-6/C-H2 Turbo Porter
Photo credit: JAMES BABINSKI
Photo from: Jetphotos.net (http://www.jetphotos.net/viewphoto.php?id=7438715&nseq=4)
low rider wrote:There is no yoke in a Porter

Zzz wrote:low rider wrote:There is no yoke in a Porter
It's a cyclic...wait no, a collective. (STOL joke)
Emory Bored wrote:Is that blond headed gal mooning the pilot? Dad gummit I think she is! Well good for her. That's the kind of stunt my beloved used to pull all the time. And we got pictures! You know what she says? That could be anybody's ass.

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest