Strip is 1000ft long.


Crzyivan13 wrote:Here is my landing at the house on Friday night. Slightly less than half fuel, and about 350 lbs of Pilot, Black Lab, and gear for the weekend. Wind was nil, DA 3000 ft reported at KPKB. I had to clear the corn which is 12-14 feet tall on the North end of my runway. Stopped in under 400 feet.
Strip is 1000ft long.

CamTom12 wrote:Wouldn't that tire size combo keep the mains touching first even in a small flare and make it easier to hold the nose off during roll out?
wavzeeee wrote:Hi, I'm relatively new here, but here's my two cents worth![]()
in the middle of fitting an Airglas HD nose fork with a 6, and 8.50's on the mains, which will expand my list of destinations. In saying that, even the standard set-up is fine for a lot of places here in Oz. They are easy to hold the nose off during the run-out with lots of elevator, and a rubber stopper (aftermarket.....) on the oleo helps relieve the pain if you slam it down![]()
Here is a a photo of the 8.50's on the main. The new fork is yet to be fitted (this is mandatory for running bigger main tyres on a p model legally).
[img]https://www.backcountrypilot.org/images/originalphotos/3828/5096/f184b5c56d57a58e3fa754c2.jpg[/img
Rickshaw84 wrote:On a scale from 1 to not knowing what the hell I'm talking aboutI lean towards the later...
That said I'v always wondered about the concept of puttingy VGs underneath the horizontal stabilizer? or really the actual elevator itself?
Again not being a rocket surgeon I'm not sure it would be beneficial but you do see VGs utilized this way in Zenith 7 series aircraft, another nosedragger "backcountry capable" airplane.
Forcing the tail down sooner and at slower speeds gets that nosewheel off the ground and prop out of the way sooner as well. I do suppose an STC would be required and a quick search didn't show any out there for this purpose.
I don't know! Just thinking out loud.
P.S Im suprised no one has thrown up the most recent Backcountry Aviation video about nosewheels in the backcountry... I know its not specific to the C182 but still apropos. (hows that for a fancy word!)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dAL52x0TPC4
mtv wrote:Actually, my preference IF you're running 8.50 on the mains is to run an 8.00 nose tire with the Landes fork. That still retains much of the original geometry of the stock gear, but gives you decent size tires on the mains, and still a pretty good footprint on the nose.
Ditto on attaching a piece of hose to the strut with hose clamps as a back up bumper. SOP in Alaska 206s.
MTV


Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests