×

Error

You need to login in order to reply to topics within this forum.

Backcountry Pilot • Engine Planning

Engine Planning

Have you modified your aircraft? STC? STOL Kit? Major rebuild from just a data plate?
37 postsPage 2 of 21, 2

Re: Engine Planning

A large diameter fine pitched prop on a Lyc O-360 or O-320 in a C170 would be great for backcountry and float ops, and said FWF would deliver a very noticeable performance upgrade from the O-300. You don't see all of the Supercub guys trading their borers in for CS props. There are a handful of reasons for this. Fixed pitch props are lighter, less complex, field serviceable, require less maintenance and work perfectly well if your mission prioritizes takeoff and climb performance over cruise performance. While I love how smooth and dependable a Continental O-300 is, O-320s and O-360s are truly outstanding engines in terms of performance and durability. Given the proposed options, I would personally make plans to install a 160 hp O-320 with something like an 8242 FP prop.
Scolopax offline
Supporter
User avatar
Posts: 1696
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2005 5:02 pm
Location: Nottingham
FindMeSpot URL: http://share.findmespot.com/shared/face ... 4aYqSexnZC

Re: Engine Planning

At the risk of sound very "hotrodish" (I'm sure that's a real word) its been suggested that gains are had by including a "port & polish" application to the jugs, thoughts anyone !!!!
Mapleflt offline
Supporter
User avatar
Posts: 2324
Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2017 2:35 pm
Location: Bradford
Aircraft: Cessna S170B NexGen (NM) Variant

Re: Engine Planning

Mapleflt wrote:At the risk of sound very "hotrodish" (I'm sure that's a real word) its been suggested that gains are had by including a "port & polish" application to the jugs, thoughts anyone !!!!


To the contrary, polishing the intakes of our slow turning low velocity engines can actually hurt power.
Unless you're reving to 8 or 9,000 RPM, you're better off keeping the intake walls rough so the fuel air mixture can tumble across it.

Porting, sure. Match the intakes, get rid of sharp edges, open any known restrictions (all within approved Continental guidelines of course). But polishing, Id say no.
Bagarre offline
User avatar
Posts: 794
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2014 7:18 pm
Location: Herndon
Aircraft: 1952 Cessna 170B project

Re: Engine Planning

See more good intel from the BCP clan, thanks
Mapleflt offline
Supporter
User avatar
Posts: 2324
Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2017 2:35 pm
Location: Bradford
Aircraft: Cessna S170B NexGen (NM) Variant

Re: Engine Planning

I'd say porting and flow matching definitely add power.
Powerflow doesn't have any 6 cylinder exhausts that I know of, but they would probably make one for you if you asked. Acorn would be great to work with on this kind of project, they are very knowledgeable and could cook something up for you that would net you great results I'm betting.
Do you have an engine shop kit there that does porting? Otherwise Pro aero in Kamloops does it. Might save a bit if you bought cylinders from them and had them do the porting right away. Saves you some extra shipping if nothing else. $1500 USD for my IO-520 was the last quote they gave me for porting/flow matching.
A1Skinner offline
Supporter
User avatar
Posts: 5186
Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2012 11:38 am
Location: Eaglesham
FindMeSpot URL: [url:1vzmrq4a]http://share.findmespot.com/shared/faces/viewspots.jsp?glId=0az97SSJm2Ky58iEMJLqgaAQvVxMnGp6G[/url:1vzmrq4a]
Aircraft: Cessna P206A, AT402/502/602

Re: Engine Planning

One other thing you might consider: The cost of an overhaul on your existing engine. Might be speedy.

MTV
mtv offline
Knowledge Base Author
User avatar
Posts: 10515
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 1:47 am
Location: Bozeman

Re: Engine Planning

The work plan includes:

Top overhaul, with higher compression pistons and associated bits & pieces (pins, rings etc)
Ported intakes (no polishing allowed)
Electronic ignition (to help with better timing etc)
Acorn exhaust ( and any required carburetor adjustments)

Can anyone suggest other power or engine efficiency enhancements ?

Cheers,
Mapleflt offline
Supporter
User avatar
Posts: 2324
Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2017 2:35 pm
Location: Bradford
Aircraft: Cessna S170B NexGen (NM) Variant

Re: Engine Planning

Mapleflt wrote:The work plan includes:

Top overhaul, with higher compression pistons and associated bits & pieces (pins, rings etc)
Ported intakes (no polishing allowed)
Electronic ignition (to help with better timing etc)
Acorn exhaust ( and any required carburetor adjustments)

Can anyone suggest other power or engine efficiency enhancements ?

Cheers,


If takeoff and climb performance are where you seek improvement, a finely pitched large diameter prop will likely deliver more than any of the aforementioned upgrades.
Scolopax offline
Supporter
User avatar
Posts: 1696
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2005 5:02 pm
Location: Nottingham
FindMeSpot URL: http://share.findmespot.com/shared/face ... 4aYqSexnZC

Re: Engine Planning

Agreed, one of the first "upgrades" I did last year was a Catto prop, very happy with it they are a great company to deal with
Mapleflt offline
Supporter
User avatar
Posts: 2324
Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2017 2:35 pm
Location: Bradford
Aircraft: Cessna S170B NexGen (NM) Variant

Re: Engine Planning

Mapleflt wrote:Agreed, one of the first "upgrades" I did last year was a Catto prop, very happy with it they are a great company to deal with


A Catto prop on a Cessna 170.

That's it, I'm moving to Canada.
Bagarre offline
User avatar
Posts: 794
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2014 7:18 pm
Location: Herndon
Aircraft: 1952 Cessna 170B project

Re: Engine Planning

Welcome to Canada sir, as mentioned earlier by fellow BCP,

"The beauty of the OM category is that you don't need a conversion, you just do it. Just have to follow some guideline. Staying under 200 hp and remaining fixed pitch are a couple of the big ones."

However there some operational limitations;

flights may only be conducted in Canadian airspace Thankfully Canada has lots to offer and explore by winged vehicle.

Its also a one way trip, no returning to a standard C of A. Some see this as having an impact on overall value and resale. Others may see it as a bonus, its very dependent on how well the airplane was cared for once placed into the OM category both work and record keeping !!
Mapleflt offline
Supporter
User avatar
Posts: 2324
Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2017 2:35 pm
Location: Bradford
Aircraft: Cessna S170B NexGen (NM) Variant

Re: Engine Planning

Bagarre wrote:
Mapleflt wrote:Agreed, one of the first "upgrades" I did last year was a Catto prop, very happy with it they are a great company to deal with

A Catto prop on a Cessna 170.
That's it, I'm moving to Canada.


Check the C170 TCDS #A-799.
Under data pertinant to all models:
item #1 propeller ( b) Sensenich 73BR-50 *or any other fixed pitch wood*.

http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guida ... Rev_55.pdf

This is the loophole (or whatever you want to call it) that lots of people seem to use as a "basis of approval" to install Catto props on their Cubs etc. A friend of mine hung one on his Luscombe based on a similar item in the Luscombe TCDS.
Your IA and / or his PMI may or may not agree with it.
hotrod180 offline
Supporter
User avatar
Posts: 10534
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 11:47 pm
Location: Port Townsend, WA
Cessna Skywagon -- accept no substitute!

Re: Engine Planning

Ah, I was looking forward to having Bagarre as a neighbor, make him an Honorary Canadian just because !!!!!
Mapleflt offline
Supporter
User avatar
Posts: 2324
Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2017 2:35 pm
Location: Bradford
Aircraft: Cessna S170B NexGen (NM) Variant

Re: Engine Planning

hotrod180 wrote:
Bagarre wrote:
Mapleflt wrote:Agreed, one of the first "upgrades" I did last year was a Catto prop, very happy with it they are a great company to deal with

A Catto prop on a Cessna 170.
That's it, I'm moving to Canada.


Check the C170 TCDS #A-799.
Under data pertinant to all models:
item #1 propeller ( b) Sensenich 73BR-50 *or any other fixed pitch wood*.

http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guida ... Rev_55.pdf

This is the loophole (or whatever you want to call it) that lots of people seem to use as a "basis of approval" to install Catto props on their Cubs etc. A friend of mine hung one on his Luscombe based on a similar item in the Luscombe TCDS.
Your IA and / or his PMI may or may not agree with it.


Yes but I think the "Any other" fixed pitch wood propeller would still need a PMA or other acceptable way to show it is airworthy.
Not saying Catto aren't great props but I dont think "or any other fixed pitch wood" pardons one from all of the requirements that or any other fixed pitch wood propeller would have to meet before being hung on a 170 or other certificated airplane.
Bagarre offline
User avatar
Posts: 794
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2014 7:18 pm
Location: Herndon
Aircraft: 1952 Cessna 170B project

Re: Engine Planning

I guess it likely that the various "cub" variants are in fact experimental themselves. I'll hold off sending you the real estate listing for Canada
Mapleflt offline
Supporter
User avatar
Posts: 2324
Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2017 2:35 pm
Location: Bradford
Aircraft: Cessna S170B NexGen (NM) Variant

Re: Engine Planning

Mapleflt wrote:I guess it likely that the various "cub" variants are in fact experimental themselves. I'll hold off sending you the real estate listing for Canada


Got any Canadian real estate listings with palm trees and no snow. Being a Mediterranean girl, my wife tells me those are some of the requirements for our next place of living or I might not be living too long.
Bagarre offline
User avatar
Posts: 794
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2014 7:18 pm
Location: Herndon
Aircraft: 1952 Cessna 170B project

Re: Engine Planning

Sorry !!!!!!
Mapleflt offline
Supporter
User avatar
Posts: 2324
Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2017 2:35 pm
Location: Bradford
Aircraft: Cessna S170B NexGen (NM) Variant

DISPLAY OPTIONS

Previous
37 postsPage 2 of 21, 2

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

Latest Features

Latest Knowledge Base