http://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/local/Sm ... 46421.html
Anybody have any more news???
OregonMaule wrote:KMYL McCall time of loss of radar contact.
01 Dec 3:51 pm MST 39 36 89 S12 10.00 -RA OVC025
01 Dec 2:51 pm MST 38 34 85 SSE15 8.00 -RA FEW020 OVC027
Was he on a IFR flight plan? Was he on top? This is the stuff that gives me nightmares.
Overcast at 2500 would be bases at 7500-8000 higher mountains obscured for sure. I don't know what the tops were then. Looks like the clouds would have been full of ice too. Looks way ugly to me.
Hoping for a miracle



..

Wish all pilots would weigh that scenario before launching into such conditions. Especially with other souls aboard who are trusting our judgement as PIC.
I know all the old salts here pictured this with the conditions mentioned.
GumpAir wrote:Wish all pilots would weigh that scenario before launching into such conditions. Especially with other souls aboard who are trusting our judgement as PIC.
I know all the old salts here pictured this with the conditions mentioned.
It's all a game of odds, and what you're willing to bet.
I flew into Kalifornia over Turkey Day holiday. Going in/out of Cameron Park I'm looking down and thinking, "If this engine quits now, I am completely hosed." There was absolutely not one single spot I could see as I climbed out, that would have resulted in an un-dented airplane if I had to glide in. And at night, double hosed. Yet guys think that's safer than the mountains?
Personally, I'll take my chances in the mountains at night anytime over jam packed big city.
Gump
Personally, I'll take my chances in the mountains at night anytime over jam packed big city.
Don't start bitching about a guy flying a Top of the line Crosscountry aircraft that happened to have an engine problem over a cloud deck!!
Littlecub wrote:Don't start bitching about a guy flying a Top of the line Crosscountry aircraft that happened to have an engine problem over a cloud deck!!
I didn't intend to give anybody crap for their priorities/decisions.
I do think that "unintended consequences" should be considered/weighed.
Everybody has to decide for theselves-and unfortunately we frequently decide for others who have no concept.
My point was intended to be that these operations should not be taken blithely
Sorry if it came across wrong!

^^^^^ GumpAir wrote:Personally, I'll take my chances in the mountains at night anytime over jam packed big city.
Gump



Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests