Backcountry Pilot • Project: 180 Skywagon - The On-Going Saga

Project: 180 Skywagon - The On-Going Saga

Aircraft building and project-level overhaul forum -- Kitplanes, experimental amateur-built, homebuilding, or even restoration of certified aircraft.
841 postsPage 8 of 431 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 ... 43

Re: New C180H - The Madness Begins...

Wasn't the v brace factory on some models? Maybe part of a float kit only.
Could the v brace be a log book entry only?
Terry offline
User avatar
Posts: 1365
Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2007 9:11 pm
Location: Willamette Valley
FindMeSpot URL: http://share.findmespot.com/shared/face ... 4GzPHI6t1d

Re: New C180H - The Madness Begins...

Atlee Dodge makes a v-brace for the 180, its $490. It's a direct replacement part for 180's with S/N Range 18030000-18050661. They can be field approved on a 170, I'd like to do this at some point. They told me they are trying to get it STC'd for the 170 and it should be in 6 months or so, but who knows if that will happen or not.

http://www.fadodge.com/index.php?option ... &Itemid=53
robw56 offline
User avatar
Posts: 3263
Joined: Thu Jan 18, 2007 9:30 pm
Location: Ward
Aircraft: 1957 C-180A

Re: New C180H - The Madness Begins...

The "V" brace for the 180 uses the FA Dodge STC. Many in the past have been field approved, but as we know is harder now.

Atlee has been saying the same thing on the STC for the C170 for a long time, so dont hold your breath. I bought one for the C170 back in Dec 2011 when I was told 3 months. I called a bunch and always got "6 months." Finally I started the process to get a field approval. My IA here in Boston seemed to think it was going to be easy. We submitted 5 other A/C approvals along with the drawings and STC for the C180. The FISDO wanted to schedule a time to come see the airplane, but I ended up selling the C170 and left it alone. The hardest part I think is forking over the $550 (with shipping) to get the "V" brace.
Bigrenna offline
KB and Supporter
User avatar
Posts: 2339
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 4:02 pm
Location: New England
Aircraft: C180H / C170B
www.bushwagoneast.com
www.avthreads.com

Re: New C180H - The Madness Begins...

I think Im getting the 180 dialed in a bit closer. I have 10hrs on since the new tires etc., and it feels nice and tight. Of course this whole CS prop thing is totally new to me, but I think Im getting it. Cross country from L.A. I was worried at the 14.5gph burn, so I've been messing around with power settings and have been happy with a lesser 11gph burn at roughly the same TAS. In the C170, the A/C seemed to want to wheel land all the time. With the 180, its the opposite. Its soooo much heavier than the 170. More practice needed...

Was a bit dreary in Eastern MA today, but a nice calm day to fly. I put 1.4 on the hobbs and headed over to Martha's Vineyard and did a couple at Katama. (such a great place) Playing all this hooky from work is gonna kick my ass come next month.

The vid-

Bigrenna offline
KB and Supporter
User avatar
Posts: 2339
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 4:02 pm
Location: New England
Aircraft: C180H / C170B
www.bushwagoneast.com
www.avthreads.com

Re: New C180H - The Madness Begins...

I love this thread, please keep the great posts coming.

MM
mountainmatt offline
User avatar
Posts: 2803
Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2009 2:43 pm
Location: Colorful Colorado
FlyingPoochProductions
FlyColorado.org

Re: New C180H - The Madness Begins...

mountainmatt wrote:I love this thread, please keep the great posts coming.

MM


X2

Bkn
Bkn4thr offline
User avatar
Posts: 51
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 8:29 am
Location: Killarney
Aircraft: '46 J3, '76 C185F Amphib, '00 AT502,’75 C172M

Re: New C180H - The Madness Begins...

What is the benefit of adding the V-brace if it isn't required? My 185 has a float kit and the V-brace is required. I think I would be happier without it. Plus it's added weight. The thing is right in my line of sight. It's like flying from inside a jail cell.
Squash offline
Supporter
Posts: 605
Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2012 12:46 pm
Location: Alaska

Re: New C180H - The Madness Begins...

Squash wrote:What is the benefit of adding the V-brace if it isn't required? My 185 has a float kit and the V-brace is required. I think I would be happier without it. Plus it's added weight. The thing is right in my line of sight. It's like flying from inside a jail cell.


It stiffens up your cabin quite a bit, if you take it out you are going to get a lot more squeaking and squaking during ground ops. You will lose a significant amount of strength taking it out.
BigNickMontana offline
User avatar
Posts: 114
Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2012 4:28 am
Location: Livingston

Re: New C180H - The Madness Begins...

BigNickMontana wrote:
Squash wrote:What is the benefit of adding the V-brace if it isn't required? My 185 has a float kit and the V-brace is required. I think I would be happier without it. Plus it's added weight. The thing is right in my line of sight. It's like flying from inside a jail cell.


It stiffens up your cabin quite a bit, if you take it out you are going to get a lot more squeaking and squaking during ground ops. You will lose a significant amount of strength taking it out.


Absolutely! My 170 didn't have one when I got it, and the first time I flew it on skis and off airport, I trotted right down and bought one. You can't believe how much that windshield moves around without the brace. It's scary.

They are required equipment on seaplane kitted 180s and I believe all 185s.

I wouldn't even consider off airport or skis without one, and even on airport, they make a big difference.

Besides, where else ya gonna hang your headset??? :D

MTV
mtv offline
Knowledge Base Author
User avatar
Posts: 10514
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 1:47 am
Location: Bozeman

Re: New C180H - The Madness Begins...

I have a 1961 C-185, the 3rd one built. It has no brace, but I am interested in installing one. Is it riveted in place or bolted? My windshield has been replaced, no strip down the middle. I agree with MTV, windshields can move alot. I have seen some old ones that you can physically move by hand. The caulking strip is old and compressed.
Jay Smith offline
User avatar
Posts: 5
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 11:35 am
Location: Shreveport, LA

Re: New C180H - The Madness Begins...

I call the V brace my "oh shit handle bars" It also works great when in turbulence. Gives you a place to put your hand and brace from hitting your head.

Joe Stancil had installed this one prior to me buying it. My plane also has a float kit.

AKT
aktahoe1 offline
User avatar
Posts: 2052
Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2008 8:22 am
Location: Alaska and Lake Tahoe = aktahoe
If it looks smooth, it might be. If it looks rough, it is...www.bigtirepilot.com ...www.alaskaheliski.com

Re: New C180H - The Madness Begins...

Jay Smith wrote:I have a 1961 C-185, the 3rd one built. It has no brace, but I am interested in installing one. Is it riveted in place or bolted? My windshield has been replaced, no strip down the middle. I agree with MTV, windshields can move alot. I have seen some old ones that you can physically move by hand. The caulking strip is old and compressed.


They bolt up to the forward (carry through?) spar, using existing bolts, you might need longer bolts.
The bottom bolts up to the top of the panel, here you will probably be drilling holes and installing a doubler.
Terry offline
User avatar
Posts: 1365
Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2007 9:11 pm
Location: Willamette Valley
FindMeSpot URL: http://share.findmespot.com/shared/face ... 4GzPHI6t1d

New C180H - The Madness Begins...

It's not the windshield moving. It's the eggshell that it's attached to. :shock:
Zzz offline
Janitorial Staff
User avatar
Posts: 2854
Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2004 11:09 pm
Location: northern
Aircraft: Swiveling desk chair
Half a century spent proving “it is better to be thought a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.”

Re: New C180H - The Madness Begins...

Zzz wrote:It's not the windshield moving. It's the eggshell that it's attached to. :O


Agreed, I could care less what the windscreen's doing, but I flexed the airframe so hard last summer that the lower corner of the windscreen actually popped out of the channel :shock: . This is a major pain to try and rectify in the sticks...This happened on the ground, and admittedly, the weather stripping was dried and worthless in helping keep things attached. But had this happened in the air as a result of a nasty air bump, I think it would have taken the whole windscreen off. In a monocoque airframe like a Cessna this probably would have been a major foul... :shock:

Take care, Rob
Rob offline
Supporter
User avatar
Posts: 1569
Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 10:34 am

Re: New C180H - The Madness Begins...

Got the Skywagon on the scales this weekend.

We all know that most paper weights are BS, and in my case, the Skywagon had not been on scales since it left the factory. When I bought it, I laughed at the seller when he showed me the W&B. "There is no way it weights that." I remember saying.

In this case, my 66 was 81lbs OVER what the paperwork stated at 1796lbs. Note: the weight was corrected with the orig 6.00x6 tires, TW and tire it came with, 5 gal of fuel (useable,) and 12qts of oil.
Last edited by Bigrenna on Sun Dec 23, 2012 10:37 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Bigrenna offline
KB and Supporter
User avatar
Posts: 2339
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 4:02 pm
Location: New England
Aircraft: C180H / C170B
www.bushwagoneast.com
www.avthreads.com

Re: New C180H - The Madness Begins...

mtv wrote:They are required equipment on seaplane kitted 180s and I believe all 185s.

I don't think they are "required" on 185's, perhaps just a good idea. There's an A185F here that's been flying backcountry grass & gravel airstrips for about 25 years without a V-brace. Image

Thanks Bigrenna for all the entertainment, this really is a very cool thread. Where did you get scales capable of weighing a plane?
Battson offline
Knowledge Base Author
User avatar
Posts: 1810
Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 11:19 pm
Location: New Zealand
Aircraft: Bearhawk 4-place
IO-540 260hp

Re: New C180H - The Madness Begins...

bigrenna wrote:Image

Had a real productive weekend with the Skywagon.

As is important to all of us, (aside from learning to fly this thing proper) weight is foremost on my mind. Before really digging into the project, a baseline was needed from which to judge all the mods that will take place. To do this, I tossed everything back in the airplane as I purchased it, jacked it up to flight attitude and got it on the scales.

People always seem to have a visceral opinion when it comes to weight and balance. So many guys say "never weight the airplane...," or "you dont want to know." This makes no real sense to me as I always have felt it important to know what I was dealing with.

We all know that most paper weights are BS, and in my case, the Skywagon had not been on scales since it left the factory. When I bought it, I laughed at the seller when he showed me the W&B. "There is no way it weights that." I remember saying.

Regardless, a baseline was needed, so we weighed it.

In this case, my 66 was 81lbs OVER what the paperwork stated at 1796lbs. Note: the weight was corrected with the orig 6.00x6 tires, TW and tire it came with, 5 gal of fuel (useable,) and 12qts of oil.

Gutting next...

Image

Image

Image


Interesting that your rudder control cables come from the bottom in front of the cone and are "under" your stinger. Mine come out of the cone and are "above" the stinger. This photo of mine makes it appears as though there is a curve but they are straight down the fuselage as well. Just something I noticed here is all...How much cable is exposed on yours? Curious...Mine are about 8 inches and above the stinger. Makes me wonder about having your tail in the rough stuff and turning around. Just something to ponder on.

Image

AKT
aktahoe1 offline
User avatar
Posts: 2052
Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2008 8:22 am
Location: Alaska and Lake Tahoe = aktahoe
If it looks smooth, it might be. If it looks rough, it is...www.bigtirepilot.com ...www.alaskaheliski.com

Re: New C180H - The Madness Begins...

Battson wrote:
mtv wrote:They are required equipment on seaplane kitted 180s and I believe all 185s.

I don't think they are "required" on 185's, perhaps just a good idea. There's an A185F here that's been flying backcountry grass & gravel airstrips for about 25 years without a V-brace. Image

Thanks Bigrenna for all the entertainment, this really is a very cool thread. Where did you get scales capable of weighing a plane?


Going along with my last post above and photos... I am now noticing a lot of Skywagons with this set up on the cables hanging below the stinger. As an example of concern, look at the yellow bush in this photo. The cables would drag through the brush if turning around quickly.

Curious if anyone has ever heard of anyone tearing/breaking cables like this?

AKT
aktahoe1 offline
User avatar
Posts: 2052
Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2008 8:22 am
Location: Alaska and Lake Tahoe = aktahoe
If it looks smooth, it might be. If it looks rough, it is...www.bigtirepilot.com ...www.alaskaheliski.com

Re: New C180H - The Madness Begins...

Kevin:

The TW steering was "improved" in 1955 or 56 to pull more directly on the horn. That's the reason you see the cables below. Only our early 180's have the steering cables that thread through the stinger. Not sure how yours is but my tailwheel steering sucks.

Flynengr
flynengr offline
User avatar
Posts: 369
Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2008 10:52 pm
Location: Northern Kaleeforneeya

Re: New C180H - The Madness Begins...

My buddy's 185 has cables like Bigrenna's. He spends about 90% of the time on floats but I'll ask if he's ever had any issues with the cables snagging/breaking.
CamTom12 offline
User avatar
Posts: 3705
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2012 1:08 pm
Location: Huntsville
FindMeSpot URL: https://share.delorme.com/camtom12
Aircraft: Ruppe Racer
Experimental Pacer
home hand jam "wizard"

DISPLAY OPTIONS

PreviousNext
841 postsPage 8 of 431 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 ... 43

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

Latest Features

Latest Knowledge Base