Backcountry Pilot • Tri-pacer vs. tri-Maule??

Tri-pacer vs. tri-Maule??

Technical and practical discussion about specific aircraft types such as Cessna 180, Maule M7, et al. Please read and search carefully before posting, as many popular topics have already been discussed.
Post a reply
82 posts • Page 5 of 5 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Thu Apr 25, 2019 8:28 pm

Re: Tri-pacer vs. tri-Maule??

1:1 Scale wrote:
TxAgfisher wrote:Just did Albuquerque to Houston and back this week in about 4hrs each way, Maule won’t do that!

Just for frame of reference, what was your TAS and fuel burn? A cousin is breaking in his new O470K, and at 25 square, 2k feet was indicating 160mph and 19.2gph.


150mph at 11.5gph
TxAgfisher offline
User avatar
Posts: 294
Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2014 5:30 pm
Location: Mineola
Aircraft: C180 and Super Cub
top
Fri Apr 26, 2019 5:35 am

Re: Tri-pacer vs. tri-Maule??

ColoMtnMan wrote:Flying the Rocky Mtn West, a 182 do will very well, loaded, in high hot airports. Very good choice. The very first 182 built (1956?) is still flying, in MT I think. I had a 73 182P, flew it from FL to CA more than once. Currently fly a Mirage for XC. Dave B


Dave, you're my new best friend! You just haven't met me yet! When are you coming to visit with that Mirage? ;)
WWhunter offline
Supporter
User avatar
Posts: 2036
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 1:54 pm
Location: Minnesota
Aircraft: RANS S-7
Murphy Rebel
VANS RV-8
top

DISPLAY OPTIONS

Previous
Post a reply
82 posts • Page 5 of 5 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Return to Aircraft Types

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

Latest Features

Latest Knowledge Base