8GCBC wrote:Nosedragger wrote:Notes to self:
1) don't use ifr terms on a vfr day. Final approach fix may be construed As final to others and vfr traffic doesn't know where the hell BUMFK is.
2 ) entering a hold over the faf is a good way to practice required holding patterns AND give your vfr buddies room. 6 minutes later, they're landed and you're at the fix again to shoot the approach with a hold in your logbook.
Agreed. Some guys think they are talking to ATC on CTAF on a VFR day with other VFR aircraft around them!
Students and most non-IR private pilots don't have any concept of IFR approaches, so it's definitely best to use "VFR terminology", such as the Seneca pilot apparently did in this case, i.e., so many miles north on a straight in for 15.
This thread brings up another issue, that those who are comfortable flying in and out of towered airports often feel overwhelmed at a busy non-towered airport--and quite frankly, it works the other way, also. So all of us need to get regular practice at both.
That includes both types for the IR folks, too. As the saying goes, you fly like you train. If all you ever do is fly IFR into towered airports, shooting approaches into non-towered airports is a bit different and a lot intimidating, especially if it's a non-radar environment, which is common. It's not good to have your only experience doing it on a low IFR day, where you're in IMC down to about 6 or 700 feet AGL in Class E, and then when you switch to CTAF, to hear Bugsmasher XXX is taking the runway you're approaching, because he doesn't mind scud-running. Best to have experienced that in practice, first. So I would not advocate only shooting practice approaches at the nearest C or D. For another thing, you're likely to have to fly pretty far in some cases. For instance, in Wyoming, the only towers are at Cheyenne, Casper, and Jackson. In Colorado, you've got the 4 in the Denver area, Colorado Springs, and Pueblo along the Front Range, and Grand Junction on the Western Slope. Yet in Wyoming, there are 40 non-towered airports, and in Colorado there are 67 non-towered airports. Granted that not all of the non-towered airports have instrument approaches, but the majority do.
With the exception of the occasional Citabria prick as in this case, melding practice IFR approaches into a non-towered pattern isn't difficult, as long as everyone does things responsibly. That means pay attention, get the big picture in your mind, and fly safely according to the regs and the AIM. It's the characters who make up their own patterns and TPAs that are the trouble-makers, not the occasional IR pilot doing IFR practice approaches.
In this case, to be repetitive, I think both Kev and the Seneca pilot did just fine. The Citabria jerk was out of line.
Cary