
DeltaRomeo wrote:It occurs to me that landing in remote areas would draw the attention of DEA and other agencies as being suspicious traffic for potential drug drops, etc. What is the best way to prevent being perceived as such? We plan to operate off our ranch in New Mexico (haven't done it yet as we have been working to get to that point) and it is fairly well known that that part of the US is prone to drug operations. Is there any communications that could be made to declare your intentions and identify yourself? In our area we would be well distanced from any airports of which none are towered and communicating on the CTAF is not likely to be useful. Just want to make sure we're not raising any red flags.
.I am not sure I am completely comfortable with that statement.Examples abound. For instance, anyone remember the 1996 Atlanta Olympics?.
If your not doing anything illegal then what's there to be worried about?
I am sure we can all recall other similar situations..
Rudolph's statement authoritatively cleared Richard Jewell, a Centennial Olympic Park security guard, of any involvement in the bombing. Jewell fell under suspicion of participating in the bombing a few days after the incident, after having been initially hailed as a hero for being the first one to spot Rudolph's explosive device and helping to clear the area. When he came under FBI suspicion for involvement in the crime, Jewell became the prime suspect and an international news story.


NineThreeKilo wrote:Be polite, don't show attitude, state nothing without a lawyer, ask questions, DONT make statements, record everything but DO NOT tell them you're recording.
rw2 wrote:NineThreeKilo wrote:Be polite, don't show attitude, state nothing without a lawyer, ask questions, DONT make statements, record everything but DO NOT tell them you're recording.
How come? Seems like knowing that it's being recorded might keep them civil and adhering to the law. I don't have a thorough study to cite, but I have several anecdotes showing the when the police are aware they are being documented (civilly! don't shove a camera in their face and declare your right as a sovereign citizen to get into a debate about the law) their behavior is good. Now, of course, I don't have a control group where things were different so maybe these stories just involve the majority of LEO that do try to do their job properly...
Anyway, I'm wandering. Why do you suggest not telling them?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests