
whee wrote:Interested in what people have to say. I've been doing some looking because I might need to replace the gill 25 in my Luscombe but wanted to use a odyssey. IA says not unless it is approved for the plane. Seen lots of good reviews for the PC680 in a 180; what approval method are people using?
182 STOL driver wrote:whee wrote:Interested in what people have to say. I've been doing some looking because I might need to replace the gill 25 in my Luscombe but wanted to use a odyssey. IA says not unless it is approved for the plane. Seen lots of good reviews for the PC680 in a 180; what approval method are people using?
PC
Minor modifaction per AC43.2a chapter 10 - log book entry and 337 to records .
PC 680 is motorcycle / watercraft battery where SBSJ16 is aircraft version ,same weight and size.
SBSJ16 is stc and PMA approved on PA18 and other piper models. Get rid of the wet cell battery's entirely !
Concord is OK but 20 lbs heavier than PC680 or SBSJ16 .


Jeredp wrote:Go for the rg35-xc the few extra bucks is well worth it the extra cranking amps for the big continentals

182 STOL driver wrote:whee wrote:Interested in what people have to say. I've been doing some looking because I might need to replace the gill 25 in my Luscombe but wanted to use a odyssey. IA says not unless it is approved for the plane. Seen lots of good reviews for the PC680 in a 180; what approval method are people using?
PC
Minor modifaction per AC43.2a chapter 10 - log book entry and 337 to records .
PC 680 is motorcycle / watercraft battery where SBSJ16 is aircraft version ,same weight and size.
SBSJ16 is stc and PMA approved on PA18 and other piper models. Get rid of the wet cell battery's entirely !
Concord is OK but 20 lbs heavier than PC680 or SBSJ16 .

shorton wrote:Odyssey is the only way to go. I have used Gill and concorde and will not go back to either.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests