It's not how close you get to the ground, it's how precise you fly the airplane.
Nosedragger wrote:It's not how close you get to the ground, it's how precise you fly the airplane.
RobBurson wrote:A lot of proselytizing going on here, eh denalipilot.
Cheers
From Wikipedia:
Proselytizing is the act of attempting to convert people to another opinion and, particularly, another religion. The word proselytize is derived ultimately from the Greek language prefix 'πρός' (toward) and the verb 'ηλυτος' (went). Historically in the Koine Greek Septuagint and New Testament, the word proselyte denoted a gentile who was considering conversion to Judaism. Though the word proselytism originally referred to Early Christianity (and earlier Gentiles), it also refers to other religions' attempts to convert people to their beliefs or even any attempt to convert people to another point of view, religious or not. Today, the connotations of proselytizing are often negative and the word is commonly used to describe attempts to force people to convert.

RobBurson wrote:Nosedragger wrote:It's not how close you get to the ground, it's how precise you fly the airplane.
Listen from 1:38 to 1:55
nmflyguy wrote:motoadve wrote:As a low time pilot myself, I understand the cables, towers and obstacles being a risk.
But when people talk about engine failure, why is it ok to fly IFR in a single engine plane,and engine failure is not taken into account as much.
I think it would be as dangerous or even more an engine failure at imc than at low altitude VFR.
What's nice about threads like these - even if they result in some anger or posturing or scolding - is that you get to hear a lot of different and often clashing perspectives about things you may never have thought much about. If I only hear stuff I agree with, then I'm not learning anything. I've learned some good stuff from this thread, and I expect you have too.
Nosedragger wrote:It's not how close you get to the ground, it's how precise you fly the airplane.
motoadve wrote:why is it ok to fly IFR in a single engine plane,and engine failure is not taken into account as much.
For anyone that thumps their chest
Nosedragger wrote:It's not how close you get to the ground, it's how precise you fly the airplane.
lowflybye wrote:Nosedragger wrote:It's not how close you get to the ground, it's how precise you fly the airplane.
The precision required to safely fly an aircraft is inversely proportionate to its height above the ground. The closer you get to the edge of the sky, the more dangerous it gets and the more precision it takes to do it safely.
shorton wrote:Hey Gump,
What say you to that Master YODA??
Shane

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests