Got it, 3 lbs 11 ozs, pretty good for 9 gallon capacity. Note that these are not designed for pouring, rather pumping out of, perfect for my use.


Best of all, it doesn't leak out the cap! They make various fittings, I may change that 3/8" withdraw fitting to a 90 degree one, they include a tool for this, it would have been nice if I knew this in advance. Lashed down on the E-bike trailer, (test purpose with draw plumbing shown) I need, and have on the way, a quick disconnect fitting immediately downstream of the withdraw fitting, and changing that to a 90 degree like the filler will make it more compact rather then sticking up. The fabric has some texture to it, not slippery in other words, this is a good thing.

Yeah, it was all sunshine and lollipops.... until I noticed a small placard mixed in with the other packaging material "GAS ETHANOL NO". This French made product has the worst broken English in all the literature, worse then the Chinese broken English I've seen in other product info! WTF

In the past I have bragged about my capability of being able to use plain old regular (low octane that is) E-10, pretty damn handy and a huge cost savings. It will be a total deal breaker if I can't use E-10 in this thing. So, I tried to email the manufacturer to ask about how and why they determined the supposed unsuitability of their product to ethanol, no luck there, not yet anyway, their website was difficult to navigate and the same with their email. Then I emailed the US based marine supplier I bought it from, and suggested it may be a good frigging idea to mention in their product info that it is recommended it only be used with pure gas, no response back yet, but too soon to tell.
So, for now, I either throw it away and forget about it (I of course already put fuel in it, so can't really return it I'm guessing), or just put pure gas in it (that will work, until the first time I can't get any, most of the time when on a trip) OR I can assume they are being badly advised by their lawyers and overly cautious and just go ahead and use E-10 anyway. I believe the use of E-10 in Europe is fairly new, and they may still be feeling their way. If I take this path, I will also be assuming that a cheap inline filter, one of those clear ones where you can see the element, will suffice to alert to me the possibility of any breakdown in the bladder and also prevent introducing any gunk into my main fuel system. I don't much care if the only problem with E-10 use is a shorter life span of the bladder, I'm not planning to fly with this filled anyway, this is just a ground transport scheme, if it springs a leak, big deal. Also, the bladder would only have E-10 in it for an hour or so at most, the rest of the time it'd be empty. BTW, none of the on line suppliers of this product thought it worth mentioning in their product info that is listed as being non E-10 approved.
Since this cost me $395.00, and like most of us I don't like looking like a dumb ass

, I hesitated before posting about this little hitch in this product, but short of jumping on an airliner and going to France and dealing with the manufacturer directly

I will if worse comes to worse just eat it, financially. As Otto Lillienthal famously said "sacrifices must be made"! My best guess is, while trying not be over optimistic due to the dollars involved, I'll be fine using E-10, the clear filter should be adequate in insuring clean fuel delivery .