Slippery Wing wrote:Any operational limitations on those with insurance through Avemco? Off airport ops, grass strips, etc.?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
No operational limitations for me.
Slippery Wing wrote:Any operational limitations on those with insurance through Avemco? Off airport ops, grass strips, etc.?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
hotrod180 wrote:C180_guy wrote:.. It is BWI that is being less than helpful in this case.
C180 guy, I'm curious if you talked to a higher-up at BWI and if so, what the outcome was.
Or if you just went elsewhere.

G44 wrote:Slippery Wing wrote:Any operational limitations on those with insurance through Avemco? Off airport ops, grass strips, etc.?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
No operational limitations for me.
C180_guy wrote:.... Called and asked to speak to Matt but was told his phone wasn't working or something like that. I told my account representative to stop screwing around and submit the higher hull value request to the underwriter and they reluctantly agreed. The underwriter came back and increased the hull to $100K as requested. BWI needs to get it together.
StuBob wrote:I’m tempted the same way. But values have gotten so high that I now find myself owning an airplane I couldn’t afford to buy. If I couldn’t buy it, I sure can’t self-insure it.

185Midwest wrote:Paul
What kind of hull value are you thinking to cover? Also I''m curious what your carrier will need for value justification based on the very unique and complete nature of your rebuild.
I'd be interested in the process if you are willing to share.
Thank you
JC
corefile wrote:Here in California we have annual use tax on the aircraft.
hotrod180 wrote:corefile wrote:Here in California we have annual use tax on the aircraft.
Since you refer to it as a "tax", not a "fee",
I assume it is cost / value based.
What is the percentage of vale, and where does the state get that value?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests