In Idaho you fly to JC on the floor of a canyon at 5000', next to 8,000' ridge lines, with a full service city what? 30 miles away...
In Alaska the neighboring ridgelines can be similar elevations.... with the floor at sea level
If wrecking in Idaho at noon scares you, I'd say don't even think about venturing into the Brooks range... not even at 0600....Heck, easy peasy Rainy, Lake Clark, or Merrill passes may not even be your cup of tea, and we haven't even got to a destination to land yet
Want another interesting phenomena in close proximity to big rocks? Try flying around the toe of a big glacier at mid day while that cold airmass is cascading down it. Two years ago I recall a group of lower 48 cubs playing in this on the Tana. A gorgeous Topcub learned the hard way about tailing into the wind in it. I guarantee helicoptering that cub out of there was wayy spendier than the same ride out of anywhere in the lower 48, and that barely scratches 'bush Alaska'.
This flying jazz can be as easy or as hard as we choose to make it, no matter where you do it... A guy once asked me if the Wx was quite a bit harder to fly in Alaska? I just couldn't grasp that concept? Wx? jeez... I thought Wx was a simple go or no go decision regardless of where you launched from? Yes I am sure I can make it, or no I really don't know... anything else and you're the one making it hard, not the location....
Troy, don't sell your state short... it may not be the real deal... but it's real
Kevin, interesting thought coming from an Alaskan.
EZ, you're a funny cat
Take care, Rob

