Backcountry Pilot • The Approach: A new series on backcountry flying strategy

The Approach: A new series on backcountry flying strategy

Share tips, techniques, or anything else related to flying.
61 postsPage 2 of 41, 2, 3, 4

Re: The Approach: A new series on backcountry flying strateg

clippwagon wrote:
Terry wrote:1skywagon...2skywagon....3skywagon.
1maule...2maule...3maule.
I just figured out why those Maule's get off the ground quick.....it's a short word? :)


Dang, I thought it was because they were so ugly the ground repelled them! #-o

CW

Must be why those dam cub's get off so fast also?? =D>
I know it must work, MAX Holste Broussard, MAX Holste Broussard, MAX Holste Broussard #-o
M6RV6 offline
User avatar
Posts: 2313
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2008 5:52 pm
Location: Rice Wa. 82WN Magee Creek AERODROME
FindMeSpot URL: http://share.findmespot.com/shared/face ... sWKXuhKlg2
Have as much Fun as is Safe, and Keep SMILIN! GT,

Re: The Approach: A new series on backcountry flying strateg

clippwagon wrote:Dang, I thought it was because they were so ugly the ground repelled them! #-o


I knew a Maule owner who used to say "the only two things that can make a Maule prettier are distance and darkness." :D
RanchPilot offline
User avatar
Posts: 974
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2011 5:18 pm
Location: Wyoming
Experience is the knowledge that enables you to recognize a mistake when you make it again.

RanchPilot Facebook Community: http://www.facebook.com/ranchpilot777

Re: The Approach: A new series on backcountry flying strateg

Great article!

I remember one take off at Bryce Canyon (7586 ft) on a warm afternoon, fully loaded.

It was like "One Baked Potato with Caramelized Onions and Mushrooms, Two Baked Potatoes with Caramelized Onions and Mushrooms..." :D
Oregon180 offline
KB and Supporter
User avatar
Posts: 1259
Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2007 10:37 am
Location: Ashland
Aircraft: C180B

Re: The Approach: A new series on backcountry flying strateg

Thanks for putting this all together! The technique is good to learn. Cole Ellis, a guide up here, always stresses during our pilot round tables that if surface and obstructions permit use the whole runway, less can go wrong when you are planted on the ground accelerating rather than horsing it off in ground effect if that isn't needed. He said his clients always comment that they barely made it off the strip but that is just him using all that he has available. I think someone mentioned that here about being in gusty winds, that would be a time to do it. I like the concept of counting and getting an idea of when things should be happening. Unless you fly hundreds of hours a season I don't think you can depend on feel.

Also if the earth repels Maules because they are ugly then Zeniths should be launching to the moon.
jprax offline
Supporter
Posts: 83
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2010 10:23 pm
Location: Valdez, AK

Re: The Approach: A new series on backcountry flying strateg

contactflying wrote:Grassstrippilot,

I used several different 150s, 152s and 172s on the pipeline and they are not standard or dependable on how much flap you get without looking where you don't need to be looking. I just set the flap one notch or ten percent before adding power and kept the stick full back until the nose wheel came off. I held the nose wheel just off until the mains came off and then pushed over hard to stay in very low ground effect. The difference in six inches and six feet extra ground effect acceleration rate is tremendous. Like spraying in the crop field, it is important to proactively and dynamically move the wheel/stick fore aft slightly to stay ahead of the airplane. If you just hold the wheel, you will invariably get climb or descend.

The same fore/aft stick technique is necessary to stay in low ground effect with a tailwheel airplane.

Another important technique with crooked runways or departure zones or laterally limited obstructions is to maintain wings level in low ground effect while pushing the nose around with rudder, a skid, to miss the obstruction laterally. We crop dusters never attempt to go over anything we can rudder turn around in ground effect. The common habit of pulling up and putting a wing down to turn before plenty of maneuvering speed is achieved is dangerous. It often gives up the free energy of ground effect prematurely. Once that wing goes down, we can't regain ground effect unless we level the wing. I cartwheeled an A9 Callair and walked away. Spray planes are designed to crash, however. I broke the right wooden spar twice and knocked the engine off.

I can't scientifically explain why, but hitting wind shears and gust spreads in low ground effect always take us sideways, as the other pilot mentioned. I think the hard cushion in low ground effect prevents descent, unless very slow anyway. You would think that in the crop field at greater than cruise speed (because of ground effect) we would sometimes balloon. In 17,000 hours, it never happened to me.

Rapid acceleration is the key to getting off short when heavy and/or at high density altitude. The engine, with less fuel air mixture (lean to peak) can't help. You may already be at ceiling where there is no excess engine thrust for climb. In this case, attempting climb is the most dangerous thing you can do. That is why we always want to know which way is down hill and how we might get there in ground effect, if possible. This is often possible in the high desert and mountains because of the lack of vegetation. Airplanes accelerate well with the nose wheel off or with no angle of attack (tailwheel up and fuse level). They accelerate even better with no ground contact in low ground effect. This is why the test pilot records the max speed when in low ground effect over the beach.


Good thoughts. Thanks! Basically I'm doing as you described. I like the rudder turn idea and it makes sense. I don't think I'd heard of the acceleration difference between low and high ground effect. Interesting. I'll have to play with it.

Zzz wrote:
Grassstrippilot wrote:Great video!

I'd like to hear their thoughts for the nose wheel and electric flap drivers. Not all of us have Johnson Bars unfortunately.


That's a good point, but unfortunately that's the downside to electric flaps: It's hard to "pop" them on due to the slower response.


Yeah, I knew that the "pop" was the key and unfortunately not available with electric flaps. Thought I'd ask anyway.
Grassstrippilot offline
Knowledge Base Author
User avatar
Posts: 3536
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 6:17 am
Location: Syracuse, UT
FindMeSpot URL: https://share.garmin.com/WolfAdventures
Aircraft: Cessna 205

Re: The Approach: A new series on backcountry flying strateg

My 170 seems to take a few more potatoes to get off the ground :D
robw56 offline
User avatar
Posts: 3263
Joined: Thu Jan 18, 2007 9:30 pm
Location: Ward
Aircraft: 1957 C-180A

Re: The Approach: A new series on backcountry flying strateg

I have found it's a whole lot easier to stay in ground effect if I set the trim somewhat nose down. As speed builds with neutral trim, the airplane tends to climb out of ground effect. For me it's easier to pull back on the yoke/stick to keep the airplane off the ground, than to have to push on the yoke/stick to keep it close to the ground.

I think my video of taking off from Marble shows staying pretty close to the ground, by nosing over as soon as the mains leave the ground. youtube.com/watch?v=LPNaGwZ2fA8 Sorry for the lousy quality--I fly pretty well, but my videography talent is sorely lacking. :)

Frankly, I've never tried "popping" off with the flaps--have to try that to see if it seems to help break ground sooner.

Cary
Cary offline
User avatar
Posts: 3801
Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2010 6:49 pm
Location: Fort Collins, CO
"I have slipped the surly bonds of earth..., put out my hand and touched the face of God." J.G. Magee

Re: The Approach: A new series on backcountry flying strateg

When I was flying a C206 and needed maximum take-off performance I would roll on full power with 1 notch of flaps, then after getting positive acceleration, 2 or 3 potatoes, put in the second notch of flaps. (I dropped the lever all the way down and then move it back up to the 2nd notch, easier to do without looking) The motor deployed the flaps at a rate that seemed just right for the TO roll. It's not so much pop the flaps as it is reducing drag for initial acceleration, then adding the extra flap and having them slowly come in and the airplane starts flying.

Now I'm flying a Highlander and pop the flaps for every TO. I start the TO roll with no flaps, get some acceleration and pull full flaps. My thinking has been that no flaps have less drag for initial acceleration. I'm going to try starting the roll with 1 notch like in the article, it probably adds very little drag and will help get the tail flying sooner.

This is a great article, thank you to the author, editor and everyone on this site, I've gotten a lot of good information since I signed up a few months ago. Guess I'll quit freeloading and make a donation to help keep it going!
handsrdirty offline
User avatar
Posts: 66
Joined: Sat Jan 04, 2014 6:28 pm
Location: Front Range CO
Aircraft: JA Highlander

Re: The Approach: A new series on backcountry flying strateg

I've gotten lazy, knowing I will be using one notch of flaps for take off, usually after landing, (with full flaps) before I even get out to take a leak (usually) I go back to my one notch takeoff position. This saves me one more thing to mess with on takeoff, my pre takeoff checklist is already complex enough (engine running, gas in the tank, parking brake OFF?). If I will be taking a picture of a new site, with the plane in it, I will raise the flaps fully, as it may look like I forgot.....but with no one looking I just leave them in the takeoff position, what could be simpler? Sometimes I also play around with starting the roll with no flaps, and then do the pop thing, it helps a bit, not much but a little, if I have the room I'd rather have the extra speed on liftoff then a 15' shorter takeoff. Every now and then, if I screw up and land a spot with much less takeoff room then I thought, a new off airport site, I use every trick in the book, accelerating through the turn around, no flaps then popping it, anything to avoid walking home. :shock:
courierguy offline
User avatar
Posts: 4197
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2005 6:52 pm
Location: Idaho
"Its easier to apologize then ask permission"
Tex McClatchy

Re: The Approach: A new series on backcountry flying strateg

I also horse it off with lots of elevator and flaps if I need to get off the ground early.
I would like some input from others on this, when we horse it off the ground it's mushy with lots of drag.
So if I'm on solid ground trying to clear an obstical I think it's better to stay on the ground longer with less drag?
Terry offline
User avatar
Posts: 1365
Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2007 9:11 pm
Location: Willamette Valley
FindMeSpot URL: http://share.findmespot.com/shared/face ... 4GzPHI6t1d

Re: The Approach: A new series on backcountry flying strateg

handsrdirty wrote:When I was flying a C206 and needed maximum take-off performance I would roll on full power with 1 notch of flaps, then after getting positive acceleration, 2 or 3 potatoes, put in the second notch of flaps. (I dropped the lever all the way down and then move it back up to the 2nd notch, easier to do without looking) The motor deployed the flaps at a rate that seemed just right for the TO roll. It's not so much pop the flaps as it is reducing drag for initial acceleration, then adding the extra flap and having them slowly come in and the airplane starts flying.

Now I'm flying a Highlander and pop the flaps for every TO. I start the TO roll with no flaps, get some acceleration and pull full flaps. My thinking has been that no flaps have less drag for initial acceleration. I'm going to try starting the roll with 1 notch like in the article, it probably adds very little drag and will help get the tail flying sooner.

This is a great article, thank you to the author, editor and everyone on this site, I've gotten a lot of good information since I signed up a few months ago. Guess I'll quit freeloading and make a donation to help keep it going!


I seem to remember Sparky talking about this...starting your takeoff roll clean and then introducing flaps after the initial acceleration. Same idea about accelerating with less drag. I did it once it twice in a 182. Seemed to work ok. I'll have to play with it and see if I notice a difference.
Grassstrippilot offline
Knowledge Base Author
User avatar
Posts: 3536
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 6:17 am
Location: Syracuse, UT
FindMeSpot URL: https://share.garmin.com/WolfAdventures
Aircraft: Cessna 205

Re: The Approach: A new series on backcountry flying strateg

Terry,
Any wheels on the ground creates more drag than short term pitch up. The trick is to shorten the time we are at high pitch angle by pushing the nose over to stay in low ground effect.

The latest PTS now calls for acceleration in ground effect until Vy or Vx as appropriate. It would be more helpful if it also asked for acceleration in ground effect until near the obstacle.

You're right that practicing stalls on takeoff does not help with the acceleration that may be necessary to zoom over the obstacle.

Leaving low, level ground effect too soon is a mistake that can't be corrected. Trying to climb too fast or trying to go over an obstacle by too much altitude burns airspeed without appropriate altitude gain.
contactflying offline
Posts: 4972
Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2013 7:36 pm
Location: Aurora, Missouri 2H2
Download my free "https://tinyurl.com/Safe-Maneuvering" e-book.

Re: The Approach: A new series on backcountry flying strateg

Great videos! I youtube'd a few follow-ons and picked up some ideas I'd like to try next time I get to go up!
CamTom12 offline
User avatar
Posts: 3705
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2012 1:08 pm
Location: Huntsville
FindMeSpot URL: https://share.delorme.com/camtom12
Aircraft: Ruppe Racer
Experimental Pacer
home hand jam "wizard"

Re: The Approach: A new series on backcountry flying strateg

Terry wrote:I also horse it off with lots of elevator and flaps if I need to get off the ground early.
I would like some input from others on this, when we horse it off the ground it's mushy with lots of drag.
So if I'm on solid ground trying to clear an obstical I think it's better to stay on the ground longer with less drag?


Yes if you force it into the air early, it will be mushy and draggy. For me that is where ground effect is important. there are two versions of this for me. The first is probably the most used assuming relatively calm conditions. I try to get in the air as fast as possible and then stay as close to the ground as possible to gain some energy where to where I can transition to a solid climb. This is a balance of safety however, because you also want to get up and high enough to have some options in the event of engine/downdraft issues. Obviously more pilots crash due to lack of airspeed than engine outs, so I guess I lean towards getting more towards the bottom of the drag curve than gaining altitude too quickly, the ancillary part of that is a climb out at VX or VY is probably going to be the fastest way up anyway if you try to climb at airspeeds below vx you are now fighting the back side of the drag curve as well. Anyone who has taken off on shortish mountain runway that disappears before you get a chance to gain efficiency in ground effect knows how desperate of a feeling being on the backside of the drag curve and trying to climb can be.

The other less used method for me is to keep your wheels on the ground and just gain all your efficiency there. When it is real x-wind gusty, particularly in my Maule I like this method if it is narrow or such. I use my tires to keep lateral control until I am truly ready to climb. This way I can pop up and out of the obstacle's way with authority rather than trying fighting it when my control authority is low. The reason I don't like this method is if it is a rough surface they your gear has to suffer through that at high speed, and you also don't accelerate as quickly if you were just in ground effect particularly if the surface is soft or there is a lot of vegetation.
learntolandshort offline
Posts: 82
Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2010 1:11 pm
Location: colorado

Re: The Approach: A new series on backcountry flying strateg

Thanks for the great videos Patrick, there's some great info there. I wanted to ask about your throttle advancement. It may be the video speed, but in each shot where you're pushing the throttle forward, it seems pretty quick. I've always been chided by my instructors to be smooth and steady (i.e. somewhat slow) when advancing the throttle. Any comments you'd like to share on this subject?
Pundy offline
Posts: 198
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2010 7:50 am
Location: Carrabassett Valley, ME

Re: The Approach: A new series on backcountry flying strateg

Pundy,

Your instructors were right about smooth and steady on a long runway in a light airplane. What Patrick is teaching is for short, tight, high, heavy, obstructed, and otherwise marginal environments. Your instructors might also say, "You don't have to go there," and that would be right as well. If we choose to go there, we want to consider every energy source and how to get the very most out of that which is available. Like ground effect, full power given up for a portion of the takeoff run cannot be recovered. When we think we don't need some form of energy, according to Murphy, is exactly when we will wish we hadn't left it unused.

Few of these techniques are taught in the regular curriculum because the government thinks people who know more than they know are dangerous. Inside the box is a major curriculum objective for them.
contactflying offline
Posts: 4972
Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2013 7:36 pm
Location: Aurora, Missouri 2H2
Download my free "https://tinyurl.com/Safe-Maneuvering" e-book.

Re: The Approach: A new series on backcountry flying strateg

contactflying wrote:Your instructors were right about smooth and steady on a long runway in a light airplane. What Patrick is teaching is for short, tight, high, heavy, obstructed, and otherwise marginal environments. Your instructors might also say, "You don't have to go there," and that would be right as well. If we choose to go there, we want to consider every energy source and how to get the very most out of that which is available. Like ground effect, full power given up for a portion of the takeoff run cannot be recovered. When we think we don't need some form of energy, according to Murphy, is exactly when we will wish we hadn't left it unused.

Few of these techniques are taught in the regular curriculum because the government thinks people who know more than they know are dangerous. Inside the box is a major curriculum objective for them.


Disagree both that it isn't taught and, therefore, with the ascribed motivation. One of the handiest off-airport guides I've yet seen was from the FAA.

https://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/he ... OG_Web.pdf
rw2 offline
User avatar
Posts: 1799
Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2012 1:10 pm
Location: San Miguel de Allende
FindMeSpot URL: https://share.delorme.com/LaNaranjaDanzante
Aircraft: Experimental Maule
Follow my Flying, Cooking and Camping adventures at RichWellner.com

Re: The Approach: A new series on backcountry flying strateg

Rw2,

I couldn't get your url to work so I searched for the Off Airport Guide in the FAA site. It was fine as far as it went but had nothing on Patrick's basic low ground effect takeoff or his approach or my apparent rate of closure approach or a lot of stuff we have discussed on this site. What about angling across the runway or using a taxiway in a strong crosswind? It's not the individual agents fault, but I don't think the FAA is going to go there.

If they ask for 1.3 Vso until roundout, flair, and holdoff and ask for a go around if not down within one airplane length, they are asking for a lot of go arounds. What about one way airports with no go around option? The regs allow for 115% POH gross weight in Alaska, or they used to. What about 115% gross weight takeoffs out of short fields where the go or no go point happens just as you get the tail up? The FAA doesn't go there and we don't have to go there, but some guys want to have the job and some guys just want to.

Regards,

Jim
contactflying offline
Posts: 4972
Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2013 7:36 pm
Location: Aurora, Missouri 2H2
Download my free "https://tinyurl.com/Safe-Maneuvering" e-book.

Re: The Approach: A new series on backcountry flying strateg

Thanks all of you for putting your experience in word form so I can try and understand. This is the type of flying I love. The hope is to apply better flying technics for general flying, so when that inevitable tough strip comes it will be a happy time. Just gotta keep practicing. You guys are great. =D>
Blown56 offline
Supporter
User avatar
Posts: 50
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 10:00 pm
Location: Cottonwood Id.

Re: The Approach: A new series on backcountry flying strateg

Pundy wrote:Thanks for the great videos Patrick, there's some great info there. I wanted to ask about your throttle advancement. It may be the video speed, but in each shot where you're pushing the throttle forward, it seems pretty quick. I've always been chided by my instructors to be smooth and steady (i.e. somewhat slow) when advancing the throttle. Any comments you'd like to share on this subject?


I don't think it is video speed. I get it in pretty quick, if you look at your manifold gauge it takes a while for it to come up even if your prop spools quickly. In a lot of these places you want power as fast as possible.

When I taught primary students I also taught advance the throttle slowly. This wasn't for engine longevity (especially since we would redline it for the rest of the lesson), but rather for lateral controllability. Typically students have an easier time holding centerline when they slowly advance the throttle.

I would say at least 90% of my takeoffs in my Maule have been this way since I owned it (1600 hours or so) and it went to TBO without any issue (in fact just got it back from overhaul). I know there are many many variables that go into that, but it doesn't appear that jamming the throttle had a detrimental effect in this particular case.
learntolandshort offline
Posts: 82
Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2010 1:11 pm
Location: colorado

DISPLAY OPTIONS

PreviousNext
61 postsPage 2 of 41, 2, 3, 4

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

Latest Features

Latest Knowledge Base