Backcountry Pilot • 4-place, semi-stol, semi x/c experimental taildragger?

4-place, semi-stol, semi x/c experimental taildragger?

Technical and practical discussion about specific aircraft types such as Cessna 180, Maule M7, et al. Please read and search carefully before posting, as many popular topics have already been discussed.
82 postsPage 3 of 51, 2, 3, 4, 5

Re: 4-place, semi-stol, semi x/c experimental taildragger?

Battson wrote:
DJ Balla wrote:What should I expect to pay for a decent 4-place Bearhawk?


Prices on the open (public) market range from $60k US to $145k, and you get what you pay for. "Decent" is a subjective term.

If you are on a tight budget, it would be much cheaper to buy a rough one at 60k and upgrade / fix rather than buying a prize-winner.


Understood that “decent” is subjective...my definition is: straight airframe, as strong as specified, Steam gauges, fabric interior that isn’t shredded, fabric and paint with at least 15 years left assuming that the plane gets hangared and no known engine issues.
DJ Balla offline
Posts: 78
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2018 11:31 am
Location: Apex

Re: 4-place, semi-stol, semi x/c experimental taildragger?

DJ Balla wrote:
Battson wrote:
DJ Balla wrote:What should I expect to pay for a decent 4-place Bearhawk?


Prices on the open (public) market range from $60k US to $145k, and you get what you pay for. "Decent" is a subjective term.

If you are on a tight budget, it would be much cheaper to buy a rough one at 60k and upgrade / fix rather than buying a prize-winner.


Understood that “decent” is subjective...my definition is: straight airframe, as strong as specified, Steam gauges, fabric interior that isn’t shredded, fabric and paint with at least 15 years left assuming that the plane gets hangared and no known engine issues.

I think you can get that for under $75k if you are prepared to watch Barnstormers.com for 12 months.
Battson offline
Knowledge Base Author
User avatar
Posts: 1810
Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 11:19 pm
Location: New Zealand
Aircraft: Bearhawk 4-place
IO-540 260hp

Re: 4-place, semi-stol, semi x/c experimental taildragger?

With your "desires" and with an apparent "budget mismatch", you might want to consider a partnership as a way to get your "dream plane" at a lower cost. Dividing everything by "2" makes aviation a lot more affordable. The hard part (really!) is finding the right person to partner with...

(And that's why I'm the sole owner of a '65 7ECA, and the sole builder/future-owner of a Bearhawk Patrol 2-place STOL experimental.)
JP256 offline
Supporter
User avatar
Posts: 629
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 1:52 pm
Location: Cedar Park
Aircraft: Rans S-6ES

Re: 4-place, semi-stol, semi x/c experimental taildragger?

I know where there is a Dream Aircraft Tundra Kit that is started. Workmanship is fantastic and the price is right. I tried a PSA the other day in Marketplace but I forgot the rules for posting there as it is not mine. Hope it’s OK to talk about it here. Give me a call 907-209-0514 if you want to know the details.
gbflyer offline
User avatar
Posts: 2317
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2007 5:35 pm
Location: SE Alaska

Re: 4-place, semi-stol, semi x/c experimental taildragger?

A Dream Tundra is a nice and capable aircraft but it will not provide the cruise speeds he is after.
DeltaRomeo offline
KB and Supporter
User avatar
Posts: 391
Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2014 11:26 am
Location: TX and NM
Aircraft: M5 180C

Re: 4-place, semi-stol, semi x/c experimental taildragger?

It’s so seldom I have anything to contribute to BCP, but I do know a little about airplane ownership, mission, and homebuilts. So, in an effort to get my post count up. . . .

Just buy a Maule!


No, no, no. That’s not it.

Is the family realistically going to fly with you and are you realistically going to go camping and whatnot? If not, just get the Pitts and be done with it. If so, get the minivan 182. Every mechanic can work on them and every potential partner can already fly one. You could probably get a 180 within your budget. It ticks the tailwheel box and keeps all of the 182’s features, though it might be a little smaller inside, depending on which 180 you’re comparing to which 182.

You’ve gotten some other good recommendations (I like Stinsons and REALLY like Aeronca Sedans), but I wouldn’t recommend something so exotic for a first-time owner. And there’s no homebuilt and no airplane with sticks that’ll do this mission, even for double your budget.
StuBob offline
Posts: 293
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2015 7:52 am
Location: Indianapolis
Aircraft: Cessna 185 Skywagon

Re: 4-place, semi-stol, semi x/c experimental taildragger?

All, thank you for the responses; they have been extremely helpful!

After thinking about many things I will clarify that yes, the stick and the experimental are “neat” but not required. Same goes for the tailwheel but of the three non-requirements i do prefer it most.

I hope I don’t offend anyone but I don’t like the idea of owning the “minivan of the sky” and as in my automotive fleet, would rather have the “Chevy Tahoe with slightly larger wheels of the sky”. That said, I called my insurance broker and was shocked at the rates given for a Maule...I need to confirm if those rates are for the fleet or only the taildragger. I also need to see how the insurance costs compare to a C180 as well.
DJ Balla offline
Posts: 78
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2018 11:31 am
Location: Apex

Re: 4-place, semi-stol, semi x/c experimental taildragger?

DJ Balla wrote:All, thank you for the responses; they have been extremely helpful!
That said, I called my insurance broker and was shocked at the rates given for a Maule...I need to confirm if those rates are for the fleet or only the taildragger. I also need to see how the insurance costs compare to a C180 as well.


I fly a Maule. My insurance is comparably to 180/182 same value. I am maybe 15% higher. If you are a low time TW pilot with no Maule time, you will get hammered the 1st year or 2. After that it will come down if you do 100 hours a year.

Back in 2007 I bought my 2000 235HP TW Maule for 130K I had 0 TW time and 100 hr in 152/150/172. The first year was $6500 I about died.
08 paid $2900
09 paid $1300
10-18 it has gone up a little every year. I have the hull at 105K now and pay $1550

Cheers...Rob
OregonMaule offline
User avatar
Posts: 6977
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 9:44 pm
Location: Orygun
My SPOT page

"They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety". Ben Franklin
http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Benjamin_Franklin

Re: 4-place, semi-stol, semi x/c experimental taildragger?

OregonMaule wrote:
DJ Balla wrote:All, thank you for the responses; they have been extremely helpful!
That said, I called my insurance broker and was shocked at the rates given for a Maule...I need to confirm if those rates are for the fleet or only the taildragger. I also need to see how the insurance costs compare to a C180 as well.


I fly a Maule. My insurance is comparably to 180/182 same value. I am maybe 15% higher. If you are a low time TW pilot with no Maule time, you will get hammered the 1st year or 2. After that it will come down if you do 100 hours a year.

Back in 2007 I bought my 2000 235HP TW Maule for 130K I had 0 TW time and 100 hr in 152/150/172. The first year was $6500 I about died.
08 paid $2900
09 paid $1300
10-18 it has gone up a little every year. I have the hull at 105K now and pay $1550

Cheers...Rob


That’s a pretty good rate, Rob. I’ve a 4-place experimental at $40k hull and pay a smidge over $1k annually.
CamTom12 offline
User avatar
Posts: 3705
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2012 1:08 pm
Location: Huntsville
FindMeSpot URL: https://share.delorme.com/camtom12
Aircraft: Ruppe Racer
Experimental Pacer
home hand jam "wizard"

Re: 4-place, semi-stol, semi x/c experimental taildragger?

OregonMaule wrote:
DJ Balla wrote:All, thank you for the responses; they have been extremely helpful!
That said, I called my insurance broker and was shocked at the rates given for a Maule...I need to confirm if those rates are for the fleet or only the taildragger. I also need to see how the insurance costs compare to a C180 as well.


I fly a Maule. My insurance is comparably to 180/182 same value. I am maybe 15% higher. If you are a low time TW pilot with no Maule time, you will get hammered the 1st year or 2. After that it will come down if you do 100 hours a year.

Back in 2007 I bought my 2000 235HP TW Maule for 130K I had 0 TW time and 100 hr in 152/150/172. The first year was $6500 I about died.
08 paid $2900
09 paid $1300
10-18 it has gone up a little every year. I have the hull at 105K now and pay $1550

Cheers...Rob


At least you ended up not being in a bad spot ! I was quoted $3400 per year on $75,000 hull...but they only wanted $900 for me in an RV6 at the same hull coverage amount.
DJ Balla offline
Posts: 78
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2018 11:31 am
Location: Apex

Re: 4-place, semi-stol, semi x/c experimental taildragger?

CamTom12 wrote:
OregonMaule wrote:
DJ Balla wrote:All, thank you for the responses; they have been extremely helpful!
That said, I called my insurance broker and was shocked at the rates given for a Maule...I need to confirm if those rates are for the fleet or only the taildragger. I also need to see how the insurance costs compare to a C180 as well.


I fly a Maule. My insurance is comparably to 180/182 same value. I am maybe 15% higher. If you are a low time TW pilot with no Maule time, you will get hammered the 1st year or 2. After that it will come down if you do 100 hours a year.

Back in 2007 I bought my 2000 235HP TW Maule for 130K I had 0 TW time and 100 hr in 152/150/172. The first year was $6500 I about died.
08 paid $2900
09 paid $1300
10-18 it has gone up a little every year. I have the hull at 105K now and pay $1550

Cheers...Rob


That’s a pretty good rate, Rob. I’ve a 4-place experimental at $40k hull and pay a smidge over $1k annually.


https://www.gustafsonins.com/
OregonMaule offline
User avatar
Posts: 6977
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 9:44 pm
Location: Orygun
My SPOT page

"They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety". Ben Franklin
http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Benjamin_Franklin

Re: 4-place, semi-stol, semi x/c experimental taildragger?

If you are looking for reasonable insurance for a maule call Stephanie at Gallager Aviation Insurance 877-913-6247. I got quoted $1500 For a m-5 with 65k hull, and i had 300 total time (all tail wheel though).
I heard about them on this site.
buck fifty driver offline
User avatar
Posts: 11
Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2018 7:45 pm
Location: cle elum
Aircraft: cessna 150 texas tailwheel

Re: 4-place, semi-stol, semi x/c experimental taildragger?

I think I paid $1350 for 40k hull for the first year on my M4-220 through Falcon insurance. 300 total time, 275 tailwheel. Wishing I would've had higher hull. We'll see what my rate is when I get it back in the air.... #-o
1:1 Scale offline
User avatar
Posts: 235
Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2012 11:38 pm
Location: Redmond
Aircraft: Maule M4-220C
Kelly
Maule M4-220C

Re: 4-place, semi-stol, semi x/c experimental taildragger?

DJ Balla wrote:Understood that “decent” is subjective...my definition is: straight airframe, as strong as specified, Steam gauges, fabric interior that isn’t shredded, fabric and paint with at least 15 years left assuming that the plane gets hangared and no known engine issues.


There's one for sale right now on Barnstormers for $72k. Might be of interest
Battson offline
Knowledge Base Author
User avatar
Posts: 1810
Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 11:19 pm
Location: New Zealand
Aircraft: Bearhawk 4-place
IO-540 260hp

Re: 4-place, semi-stol, semi x/c experimental taildragger?

StuBob wrote:It’s so seldom I have anything to contribute to BCP, but I do know a little about airplane ownership, mission, and homebuilts. So, in an effort to get my post count up. . . .

Just buy a Maule!


No, no, no. That’s not it.

Is the family realistically going to fly with you and are you realistically going to go camping and whatnot? If not, just get the Pitts and be done with it. If so, get the minivan 182. Every mechanic can work on them and every potential partner can already fly one. You could probably get a 180 within your budget. It ticks the tailwheel box and keeps all of the 182’s features, though it might be a little smaller inside, depending on which 180 you’re comparing to which 182.

You’ve gotten some other good recommendations (I like Stinsons and REALLY like Aeronca Sedans), but I wouldn’t recommend something so exotic for a first-time owner. And there’s no homebuilt and no airplane with sticks that’ll do this mission, even for double your budget.


Sorry brother but you're incorrect on this one. STOL/XC/ sticks and experimental do exist. Murphy super rebel, Yukon, or moose meet these goals. More room and payload than a 180/182. Plus speed depending on engine choice. And they can be had for a very reasonable price if you're willing to spend some time looking and waiting.
Timberwolf offline
User avatar
Posts: 193
Joined: Sun May 11, 2014 1:24 pm
Location: Panhandle
Aircraft: RV-6 with Glass and too much power
Murphy Moose M-14

Re: 4-place, semi-stol, semi x/c experimental taildragger?

Timberwolf wrote:Sorry brother but you're incorrect on this one. STOL/XC/ sticks and experimental do exist. Murphy super rebel, Yukon, or moose meet these goals. More room and payload than a 180/182. Plus speed depending on engine choice. And they can be had for a very reasonable price if you're willing to spend some time looking and waiting.

I hope you’re right, but he has a budget of $65-85k. Have you really seen any of those models in that price range?
StuBob offline
Posts: 293
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2015 7:52 am
Location: Indianapolis
Aircraft: Cessna 185 Skywagon

Re: 4-place, semi-stol, semi x/c experimental taildragger?

StuBob wrote:
Timberwolf wrote:Sorry brother but you're incorrect on this one. STOL/XC/ sticks and experimental do exist. Murphy super rebel, Yukon, or moose meet these goals. More room and payload than a 180/182. Plus speed depending on engine choice. And they can be had for a very reasonable price if you're willing to spend some time looking and waiting.

I hope you’re right, but he has a budget of $65-85k. Have you really seen any of those models in that price range?


I have seen an occassional Super Rebel/Moose listed at the top end of his budget. Granted, generally they are more but there are some amazing bargains out there if a guy has paitience. If you consider one close to completion, they can be found at amazing prices also.
WWhunter offline
Supporter
User avatar
Posts: 2036
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 1:54 pm
Location: Minnesota
Aircraft: RANS S-7
Murphy Rebel
VANS RV-8

Re: 4-place, semi-stol, semi x/c experimental taildragger?

A few months ago there was a tri gear moose just getting phase 1 flown off for $65K with a lycoming engine. The only place I saw it listed was on the murphy forums, not on the big name sites. Search in that direction, it may still be available.
Timberwolf offline
User avatar
Posts: 193
Joined: Sun May 11, 2014 1:24 pm
Location: Panhandle
Aircraft: RV-6 with Glass and too much power
Murphy Moose M-14

Re: 4-place, semi-stol, semi x/c experimental taildragger?

After much consideration I am adjusting my mission specs as I think I went too narrow and ran out of options under $100k:

Yokes are ok, taildragger is not a requirement, 115kt cruise is ok but 4-place still required and although I probably just described a c172 or Cherokee I am looking for a more unique experience.
DJ Balla offline
Posts: 78
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2018 11:31 am
Location: Apex

Re: 4-place, semi-stol, semi x/c experimental taildragger?

DJ Balla wrote:After much consideration I am adjusting my mission specs as I think I went too narrow and ran out of options under $100k:

Yokes are ok, taildragger is not a requirement, 115kt cruise is ok but 4-place still required and although I probably just described a c172 or Cherokee I am looking for a more unique experience.


Look for a PA-22 Tri-Pacer. You can find a nice specimen for under $40K usually. Then:

▪︎ Upgrade to 180hp?
▪︎ Convert to tailwheel config down the line?

You'd still be under $100K 8) Whether that is sound financial advice, I will leave up to you.

It's an entirely different paradigm if you're used to Cessnas but I have determined that I like the old rag and tube Pipers more. They're tough. They have a tough nosegear that is part of the engine mount. Good prop clearance. Good roll cage. Skylight mod. Decent cruise. I've seen 125 mph.
Zzz offline
Janitorial Staff
User avatar
Posts: 2855
Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2004 11:09 pm
Location: northern
Aircraft: Swiveling desk chair
Half a century spent proving “it is better to be thought a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.”

DISPLAY OPTIONS

PreviousNext
82 postsPage 3 of 51, 2, 3, 4, 5

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

Latest Features

Latest Knowledge Base