I am also a huge fan of B&C; absolute class act. I have an external regulator and gear driven (Rotax 912 accessory pad gear option) alternator from them, along with all the wire and connectors for my project.
In addition, you may already be aware of Bob Nuckolls, who is associated with B&C, and participates in the Aeroelectric-list on the Matronics list server:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewforum.php?f=3I research all my electrical architectural questions there. In addition, Bob has published an open source distillation of a lifetime in the business.
http://www.aeroelectric.com/Here are a couple of articles from there that convinced me an external alternator (experimental aircraft) was the right choice for my project:
http://www.aeroelectric.com/articles/Al ... ilures.pdfhttp://www.aeroelectric.com/articles/Ph ... tinreg.pdfFinally, Bob used to hold on-site training's for groups around the US. I went to one years ago, and it was a real eye opener, fun, and helped me understand the value of simple, fault tolerant design, devoid of un-needed bells and whistles. If the opportunity presents, I suggest checking it out.
In the end, there is no one right way to design this stuff: both internal and external have their advantages and risks. As the airplane designer we get to choose. Bob taught me to be able to defend my choice using provable science and established research.
That is what stuck with me.
-Jim