Zane, don't you dare apologize. You have nothing to apologize for.
So who else writes books about Idaho? Any authors or photographers that have NOT threatened you? I might like to buy one of THEIR books. I simply don't buy from bullies.
"On March 15, 2004, at approximately 1030 mountain standard time, a Cessna 182P, N400DH, was substantially damaged when it impacted terrain during departure from Dark Canyon Middle Point, a dirt airstrip 35 nautical miles west of Monticello, Utah. The private pilot and his passenger received minor injuries. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed. No flight plan had been filed for the cross-country flight being conducted under the provisions of Title 14 CFR Part 91. The flight originated from Moab, Utah, at approximately 0800.
According to the pilot, he departed Moab, Utah at 0800 and had landed at Hite and Brown's Rim, before proceeding to Dark Canyon. He reported "7-10 knot [winds] generally out of the east." The landing at Dark Canyon was uneventful and after parking the airplane, he noted that runway surface was rough with "clump grass" and the dirt was soft. At 1028, the pilot noted the "winds [were] variable from 7 to 10 knots with gusts to 15 generally from the east" and elected to depart to the east. The ground roll was slow due to the soft dirt. Approximately two thirds down the runway, the airplane struck a "hump" and became airborne. The pilot lowered the nose slightly to gain airspeed. At the end of the runway, "the wind shifted from a headwind to a tailwind" and the airplane settled into the juniper bushes at the departure end of the runway and nosed over. Both wing spars were bent, the windscreen fragmented, and the nose wheel strut was bent aft, crushing the bottom of the fuselage. An examination of the systems revealed no anomalies."

Zzz wrote:Hey Nick, that might be getting just a hair personal. I realize it is public information, but we prob shouldn't turn this into anything more than it is, which is just BCP avoiding copyright issues.
Thanks.
RanchPilot wrote:I'm really bummed out by this whole thing. I don't know Mr. Hanselman personally, but I have several of his products and think they are among the best resources available for the kind of flying I like to do. I also have to say that, when sending me one of his products via rush delivery so I'd have it in time for Caveman, he went above and beyond to make sure I got it and included some other materials for free.
I have no idea why he handled this situation like this, and wish he had handled it differently too--especially since the pic was just a link to something already on the web. I think Zane has handled the situation as well as can be expected under the unfortunate circumstances.
As for the rest of us, I think there's a difference between supporting Zane (which I do) and trashing Mr. Hanselman. I don't think we are advancing the purpose of backcountry aviation by making a bunch of negative comments here. It strikes me as a bit of a circular firing squad for all of us who love the backcountry, many of whom have benefited greatly from his flight guides.
I agree with the consensus this should have been handled differently. Maybe we should just leave it at that? Vote with your dollars, if you want, but I'm not sure anyone benefits from any more heat being added to this situation.
My two cents.

soaringhiggy wrote:Great Idea Rob!
UtahMaule wrote:I've met Galen a few times several years ago. Great guy. He freely gave me pointers on flying and fishing (you know a guy is good if he gives away fishing tips).
Aside from this thing with his images I dare guess he has done as much or more than anyone alive to promote backcountry aviation. Before sites like this became so great Galen's book were the best resource out there. I have all his books and highly recommend them. Some of the stories in his Baja book are awesome.
So,,,, IMHO he has had a lapse in judgement here, but in the past he has been a great promoter of our craft and in my personal experience a good human being.
That wrecked 182 was part of the cost to produce the Utah book…… And with out him we would not have the fantastic Idaho and Utah maps.
Oregon180 wrote: I think the root of this unfortunate kerfuffle is just a lack of understanding of how the web works on Galen's part.

Zzz wrote:Oregon180 wrote: I think the root of this unfortunate kerfuffle is just a lack of understanding of how the web works on Galen's part.
That is exactly it. Well said. Unfortunately, my attempts at an explanation fell on deaf ears and were met with the response I initially posted about.
If he gets some more sales from this, I don't care, that's great. The more people with airstrip information in their hands the better. If fact, had he said: "Hey Zane, I noticed that you guys are showing my photo, maybe you could insert a plug for Fly Idaho?" I would have gladly done it and scratched his back without a moment's hesitation. Instead, we have this.
Always start with honey instead of vinegar in this small world.
Do not link to or embed his images here if you want to keep BCP (and me) free of legal conflict.
Thanks. -Z

WilgaBeast wrote:How about I create a mobile platform for a moderated open source airstrip guide.
Then give it away for free, because this shit is already too spendy.
May not work unless folks put in good content.
UngaWunga wrote:WilgaBeast wrote:How about I create a mobile platform for a moderated open source airstrip guide.
Then give it away for free, because this shit is already too spendy.
May not work unless folks put in good content.
Considering that I write code for a living, count me in. Fire up a GitHub project?
Android only for me, though...

Zzz wrote:If you guys are serious about that, there is a council of people you should have a brainstorming meeting with. Chris from shortfield.com and me among them. Possibly Oregon180. We have decades of software development experience, and there is a definite strategy for multi-platform content delivery.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest