Backcountry Pilot • Smooth 8.50 for SkyWagon

Smooth 8.50 for SkyWagon

Technical and practical discussion about specific aircraft types such as Cessna 180, Maule M7, et al. Please read and search carefully before posting, as many popular topics have already been discussed.
49 postsPage 2 of 31, 2, 3

Re: Smooth 8.50 for SkyWagon

slow18 wrote:Most guys carry a spare tube I’m assuming. My 180 is nose heavy, so I have 30 pounds in the extended baggage which includes an electric jack (uses the earthx jump pack). It’s pretty neat. I’ve practiced with it and works well. Also have a small lightweight inflator that runs off the jump pack too. One charge gives several minutes of air and several ups and downs of the jack. Maybe that’s all silly, but I think it might come in handy solo in the boonies.
Which electric jack do you have?
Aryana offline
Supporter
User avatar
Posts: 936
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 9:06 am
Location: SoCal
Aircraft: 1955 Cessna 170

Re: Smooth 8.50 for SkyWagon

onthegas1 wrote:A flat main in the boonies is a real concern for me. I carry a rabbit foot and can of fix-a-flat. Like to know how the 180 flat was fixed in the field.


Luckily I had a friend with me in a 182. We flew out to Moab and I picked up a set of 6.00x6 tires and tubes. They didn’t have a 8.50x6 tube and I didn’t want to take any more chances with these tires if I couldn’t sufficiently get out whatever caused the flat. I was on day 2 of a 3,000 mile week long trip and I didn’t want any more problems them. In Moab I borrowed a floor jack, jack pad, and a couple tools from the FBO. I had to buy a bicycle pump in town. Back at Angel Point the floor jack wasn’t quite tall enough so we had to use a combination of fire wood below the jack, letting some air out of the good tire, and digging with a shovel below the tire to slip them off the axle. We also held the jack pad to the gear leg with a pair of vice grips to prevent any tipping. After we got the tires swapped out I flew the jack and tools back to Moab. Then we flew back to Angel Point to camp for the night.

Image
robw56 offline
User avatar
Posts: 3263
Joined: Thu Jan 18, 2007 9:30 pm
Location: Ward
Aircraft: 1957 C-180A

Re: Smooth 8.50 for SkyWagon

[/quote]Which electric jack do you have?[/quote]

Says no longer available unfortunately. Maybe other options out there now. I paid $85 2 years ago. On the fish scale it weighs under 8 lbs. only reason I considered it was because I need ballast.

To account for the spring gear movement, you need to raise and lower the wheel a couple times with jack to release the toe in tension before doing the final raise. Plenty of battery for this. My jack reaches 18” in height and I use a spring gear jack point block.

I did use it in the field to change a Tailwheel tube and it worked great.
B6375383-6E26-469B-9B0C-111DD1A0D88A.jpeg
B6375383-6E26-469B-9B0C-111DD1A0D88A.jpeg (302.7 KiB) Viewed 1140 times
slow18 offline
Supporter
User avatar
Posts: 154
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 1:13 pm
Location: USA

Re: Smooth 8.50 for SkyWagon



I have 6 inch wheels.
lefoy84 offline
User avatar
Posts: 81
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2015 6:05 pm
Location: PalmBeach

Re: Smooth 8.50 for SkyWagon

slow18 wrote:My GW is 2950. After 150 hours mine look almost the same as they did when I installed them. Happy so far, but I’m not very smart.


The 4 ply tires?
lefoy84 offline
User avatar
Posts: 81
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2015 6:05 pm
Location: PalmBeach

Re: Smooth 8.50 for SkyWagon

Are they legal on a 180? 2900 gross



[googlemap][/googlemap]
mtv wrote:


Yeah.....if you buy a set of 10 inch wheels..... :roll:

MTV
lefoy84 offline
User avatar
Posts: 81
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2015 6:05 pm
Location: PalmBeach

Re: Smooth 8.50 for SkyWagon

Yes Lefoy. 2950 GW 180. They won’t work on an A-10 though.
slow18 offline
Supporter
User avatar
Posts: 154
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 1:13 pm
Location: USA

Re: Smooth 8.50 for SkyWagon

mtv wrote:
AEROPOD wrote:
hamer wrote:The TSO for the desser 850's states a 1600lbs rating, per tire, so as long as your bird is under 3200lbs you should be good.

850-TSO.JPG


I'm curious if the 3200# weight limit is tied to any reg. By that I mean, even a 185 at 3350 will have less than 3200 on the mains, so why can't I use them on a 185. Is there a reg or AC that relates tire rating to aircraft weight, or did we just decide this on our own via internet expertise?


If a TSO states maximum weight, I don't think you have to go any further. TSO stands for Technical Standard Order.....the standard there being weight rating.

I just have never seen any benefit to these tires, and am baffled by the amount of interest in them. Yes, smooth tires have the advantage of not throwing AS MUCH junk at your tail, but they'll still chuck some stuff at the tail.

And, as lightweight as these things are, they simply can't be very durable. Compare one of these to a Goodyear 8.50 sometime......Yes, the Goodyear weighs more, but it's also much more durable.

Flat tires in the boonies are no fun, for sure. Best thing you can do to avoid those is regularly check pressures. Some of the flats I've seen are from a spun tire, resulting from low pressure. Lots of pilots like to run pretty low pressure on tube type tires these days, which is fine, within reason. But, if you start at relatively low pressure, it doesn't take much leakage to get your tire down to dangerously low pressure.

But, there's no way I'd run these tires on....well, any airplane, frankly. Put some rubber protective shield on the leading edge of your stabilizer, and run decent tires.

MTV

MTV


The tires are great for lighter airplanes. I run them on my 120 and they are amazing. I'm probably 80% pavement, I bought mine used with 200 hrs on them, I've put another 250 hours on them and they still have plenty of tread left. For the price and the weight I can't imagine a better tire. Sure the goodyear is "more" robust, but that's adding another 20lbs to my already limited useful load. Not worth it from what I can tell.

I can't speak to the heavier airplanes with these tires.

AEROPOD wrote:Not arguing whether these are worth a damn or not. I agree, they may not be appropriate for a wagon. They are probably great on a J3/PA11 or supercub, or maybe not...

I'm usually pretty good at finding info as far as certifications and regs for modifications. I can't seem to come up with anything as far as tires, and whether or not these would be legal, or could be made legal on a 185. As far as I know all of the 850 STCs for a 185 call for 6-ply, but maybe I've missed one.

I understand just because it's legal doesn't make it a good idea. How does the weight rating of a tire relate to the gross weight as far as legality goes? Or maybe it doesn't? Does it correlate to "corner weight", as in weight on a particular gear?


I think like MTV said all the TSO does is tell you max static weight per tire, and that's about all you can conclude. I doubled it for 2 tires, but the 3rd leg does take away some weight, but what about a wheel landing? It's vague, as are most things when dealing with the FAA. I think legal determination is up to your mechanic.
hamer offline
User avatar
Posts: 231
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2018 10:30 pm
Location: Huntington Beach

Re: Smooth 8.50 for SkyWagon

Actually here's the reg:
23.733.JPG
23.733.JPG (113.8 KiB) Viewed 1080 times


To me this means you'd need a 3 point scale to see static load on each main and go based off that.
hamer offline
User avatar
Posts: 231
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2018 10:30 pm
Location: Huntington Beach

Re: Smooth 8.50 for SkyWagon

slow18 wrote:I just checked. Includes 180-180K and 185-A185F.


And no specific ply requirement?
hotrod180 offline
Supporter
User avatar
Posts: 10534
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 11:47 pm
Location: Port Townsend, WA
Cessna Skywagon -- accept no substitute!

Re: Smooth 8.50 for SkyWagon

slow18 wrote:Says no longer available unfortunately. Maybe other options out there now. I paid $85 2 years ago. On the fish scale it weighs under 8 lbs. only reason I considered it was because I need ballast.

To account for the spring gear movement, you need to raise and lower the wheel a couple times with jack to release the toe in tension before doing the final raise. Plenty of battery for this. My jack reaches 18” in height and I use a spring gear jack point block.

I did use it in the field to change a Tailwheel tube and it worked great.


Found this: https://amzn.to/2G2GO3b


Image
Zzz offline
Janitorial Staff
User avatar
Posts: 2854
Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2004 11:09 pm
Location: northern
Aircraft: Swiveling desk chair
Half a century spent proving “it is better to be thought a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.”

Re: Smooth 8.50 for SkyWagon

Thanks Zane
Aryana offline
Supporter
User avatar
Posts: 936
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 9:06 am
Location: SoCal
Aircraft: 1955 Cessna 170

Re: Smooth 8.50 for SkyWagon

hamer wrote:Sure the goodyear is "more" robust, but that's adding another 20lbs to my already limited useful load. Not worth it from what I can tell.


According to the weights I've seen, the Goodyear 8.50 x 6 tires aren't ten pounds EACH heavier, only five pounds each heavier than the Dessers.

I don't disagree that these might work fine on a very light airplane. But, that also begs the question of approvals, which many light aircraft don't have, and where you're landing.

When I owned a PA-11, I ran ABW 26 inch Airstreaks. Yes, the weight was greater than these tires, but I landed a lot of relatively rough places. If all you're doing is pavement, you don't need the Desser 8.50s either.

And, the ABW tires are ALL STC'd for many, many models of aircraft, so easy to stay legal.

MTV
mtv offline
Knowledge Base Author
User avatar
Posts: 10514
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 1:47 am
Location: Bozeman

Re: Smooth 8.50 for SkyWagon

That’s correct HotRod. If you want to see it I can email it to you.
slow18 offline
Supporter
User avatar
Posts: 154
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 1:13 pm
Location: USA

Re: Smooth 8.50 for SkyWagon

mtv wrote:
hamer wrote:Sure the goodyear is "more" robust, but that's adding another 20lbs to my already limited useful load. Not worth it from what I can tell.


According to the weights I've seen, the Goodyear 8.50 x 6 tires aren't ten pounds EACH heavier, only five pounds each heavier than the Dessers.

I don't disagree that these might work fine on a very light airplane. But, that also begs the question of approvals, which many light aircraft don't have, and where you're landing.

When I owned a PA-11, I ran ABW 26 inch Airstreaks. Yes, the weight was greater than these tires, but I landed a lot of relatively rough places. If all you're doing is pavement, you don't need the Desser 8.50s either.

And, the ABW tires are ALL STC'd for many, many models of aircraft, so easy to stay legal.

MTV


The goodyears are essentially the same diameter of the 850 dessers.

The goodyear is 22lbs each, the 850 is 9lbs each, I believe they use the same tube.

I would much prefer the 26 airstreaks, but the cost benefit ratio just isn't there for me. Hard to beat $300/tire that lasts multiple times longer than the ABW. If I had a more powerful airplane that could get in and out of rougher, shorter places then I'd be all over it. Mine are field approved, PITA, but doable.

Anyways, this thread is about 850s for 180/185s.
hamer offline
User avatar
Posts: 231
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2018 10:30 pm
Location: Huntington Beach

Re: Smooth 8.50 for SkyWagon

That lightweight jack could be a fine alternative to the heavy bottle jack I do carry. Thank you all for the valuable information regarding the boonie flat; I apologize for the thread deviation but it seemed timely.
onthegas1 offline
Supporter
User avatar
Posts: 149
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2014 4:05 pm
Location: Harlem, GA
Aircraft: Cessna A185F

Re: Smooth 8.50 for SkyWagon

Gave that up a long time ago!

slow18 wrote:Yes Lefoy. 2950 GW 180. They won’t work on an A-10 though.
lefoy84 offline
User avatar
Posts: 81
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2015 6:05 pm
Location: PalmBeach

Re: Smooth 8.50 for SkyWagon

hamer wrote:
mtv wrote:
hamer wrote:Sure the goodyear is "more" robust, but that's adding another 20lbs to my already limited useful load. Not worth it from what I can tell.


According to the weights I've seen, the Goodyear 8.50 x 6 tires aren't ten pounds EACH heavier, only five pounds each heavier than the Dessers.

I don't disagree that these might work fine on a very light airplane. But, that also begs the question of approvals, which many light aircraft don't have, and where you're landing.

When I owned a PA-11, I ran ABW 26 inch Airstreaks. Yes, the weight was greater than these tires, but I landed a lot of relatively rough places. If all you're doing is pavement, you don't need the Desser 8.50s either.

And, the ABW tires are ALL STC'd for many, many models of aircraft, so easy to stay legal.

MTV


The goodyears are essentially the same diameter of the 850 dessers.

The goodyear is 22lbs each, the 850 is 9lbs each, I believe they use the same tube.

I would much prefer the 26 airstreaks, but the cost benefit ratio just isn't there for me. Hard to beat $300/tire that lasts multiple times longer than the ABW. If I had a more powerful airplane that could get in and out of rougher, shorter places then I'd be all over it. Mine are field approved, PITA, but doable.

Anyways, this thread is about 850s for 180/185s.


Goodyear says the 6 ply 8.50 x 6 tire weighs 12 pounds, not 20.

MTV
mtv offline
Knowledge Base Author
User avatar
Posts: 10514
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 1:47 am
Location: Bozeman

Re: Smooth 8.50 for SkyWagon

Seems to me that the earlier 180 and 185's were certified under CAR3, not Part 23....might give a bit more leeway in what's required as far as tires...
John
hardtailjohn offline
User avatar
Posts: 924
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 7:06 pm
Location: Marion, Montana
God put me here to accomplish a certain amount of things...right now I'm so far behind, I'll never die!!

Re: Smooth 8.50 for SkyWagon

mtv wrote:Goodyear says the 6 ply 8.50 x 6 tire weighs 12 pounds, not 20.

MTV


When you guys mentioned "goodyear tire" I assumed you meant the blimp tires since those are smoothies. The GY 850s have tread IIRC.
hamer offline
User avatar
Posts: 231
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2018 10:30 pm
Location: Huntington Beach

DISPLAY OPTIONS

PreviousNext
49 postsPage 2 of 31, 2, 3

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

Latest Features

Latest Knowledge Base