LT4247 wrote:I thought Mr. Wieman sold the turbine at OshKosh....maybe not.
Fuel burn rate at cruise on that turbine is 21-23 gph if you don't get too agressive with it. Which is hard to do!!![]()
QUOTE:
That plane is based in Alpine Wy, about 35 miles from me. The owner, Bill Wieman is one class act and has more KOOL toys then any human should be allowed to have. IT is the only plane that could probably beat me in a short take off contest. Fuel burn in the turbine is quite high. If I remember correctly he plans for a fuel stop every 55 minutes.![]()
![]()
Ben.

yes they are suppose very unstable. But we are talking about helio couriers that have a turbo prop up front. I'll try to get some picsHalestorm wrote:Perry told me that the Helio Stallion(turbine Helio) was by far the most dangerous AND difficult to fly airplane he's ever flown/owned. Jim has owned a lot of crazy airplanes so I think that statement has some weight.
Otters have been converted to at least three different turbines, Vazar did the PT-6, both -135 and -34, and Viking did a one off -34. Texas Turbines does a Garret(900 horses!!!) and some outfit I don't know has done a Walter conversion. Never heard of an Allison (now Rolls Royce) and @ 450 hp I don't see it happening.
I would vote for an otter, on floats it's a remarkable airplane, must be a real hoot on wheels!
Sam
madpilot wrote:The k650t Sherpa is exactly what I want. Anything else out there similar?
kneel wrote:Ridge Runner,
I think the following is true. The Porter's vertical and rudder are the same exact piece each side of the horizontal and elevator. It makes a lot of sense from a production stand point.

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests