Nice looking plane.
Phil
I think it should be pretty obvious it's all in fun.... it does kind of distract credibility and seem white trashy....
It is a drag to see chest thumpers come out of the woodwork to brag up their planes, but maybe it's just been the cubbers you've ran into?
But won't even think of ever getting anything else. Nice looking rig.Wish my old beater looked that good.P.S. i like 150's too.I have to admit here is a cessna in the hanger..Rob wrote:Hi anticub,
I wasn't offended by your post... and don't really have a care about you s/n.
I think it should be pretty obvious it's all in fun.... it does kind of distract credibility and seem white trashy.... but then so do long hair and tattoos(I resemble that remark)
It is a drag to see chest thumpers come out of the woodwork to brag up their planes, but maybe it's just been the cubbers you've ran into? Most folks I've ran into with cubs in the sticks have been pretty darn cool...
Take care, Rob
(not anti-c150)![]()
BTW, I've got right at 50K in this cub, so they're not all quarter mill$ hangar queens:
John Doe had a WHOLE 55” Moose in his plane
on floats and the thing flew. The float tails were under water when we were loading and I didn’t think there was
a chance in hell he’d even get the thing on step…guess I was wrong. He can actually haul more than I can (not legally of course.
It was a common occurrence for him to fly 3 fat assed adults and gear in the plane.
He’s got an extended baggage compartment that goes back into the tail. ...one guy gets to sit backwards with his back against the back of the rear seat.
Maybe you should seek professional help for your fixations with SuperCubs. I am probably not the only one who is sick of your BS. Get a life!
Maybe you should seek professional help for your fixations with SuperCubs.
So whats the big deal?
Someone gets it. I think you had the right idea when you wanted to change your screen name. AntiCub robs you of some credibility.
AntiCub wrote:a64pilot wrote:Damn Phil,
Tell us about how you really feel. Did a SC driver steal your girlfriend?
Naw, I just love watching how defensive they get when I suggest the Stuper Cub isn't the ultimate aircraft.
Show a Cub owner an F-15 and I swear 9 times out of 10 the response will be "Yeah, but I can take off shorter!"![]()
Phil
AntiCub wrote:My VSI only goes up to 2,000ft/min and I peg it climbing at Vy under the above conditions. At gross weight on an 80 degree day, climb is down to 800ft/min. I have the VSI checked with my encoder every 2 years, and it matches my calculated rate for a 3 degree approch on the PAPI. My plane is a 1963 150C (straight back version) and only weighs 1025lbs with 6 quarts oil and 3.5 gal unusable fuel (dry weight is 992lbs) . So with me at 215lbs and 10 gals fuel at 60lbs my take-off weight is only 1300lbs. It has the same wings and engine as the later, heavier 150's so performs better.
Rob wrote:1) credability meter is dropping![]()
2) even a cub driver wouldn't have "I peg my VSI in a Vy climb"![]()
3) what WAS your girlfriends name
Take care,
Rob
Hmmm...well my POH lists climb rate at 2500ft at gross weight as 760 fpm, so the 800 I'm showing at 1000ft at gross seems about right. Maybe my VSI is progressively further off the further I get from zero? Looks like a nice evening out there, if I get time I'll grab a stop watch and time a few climbs from 1000 to 2000ft at Vy.
Phil
Maybe Cessna will start up the production line! Not Idaho SuperCub wrote:The way you portray your Cessna 150, maybe NASA might be interested in it as a replacement to the space shuttle.
Maybe even the Airforce as a replacement for the F22.
Maybe Cessna will start up the production line! Not
![]()
![]()
Idaho SuperCub
AntiCub wrote:The new 162 SkyCatcher resembles the old straight back 150 through 150C more than the newer model 150/152's.![]()
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests