I've been going the opposite direction, scrounging components for the long-discontinued .348 Winchester. 'Bout the only thing the two cartridges have in common is gunpowder.

Hammer wrote:Nice scope!
I've been going the opposite direction, scrounging components for the long-discontinued .348 Winchester. 'Bout the only thing the two cartridges have in common is gunpowder.![]()


Exactly! Haha. Although in full disclosure I've folded up around 10 buffalo with 1 shot each from my 243... I love that rifle. But I pack my 45/70 or 338 Lapua mag for bear protection.albravo wrote:Pffft! Everybody knows you can't kill anything with a .243. That's why MAGNUMS were built!
Hammer wrote:MTV's post about his Mannlicher stocked .375 made me think of my matched set of Mannlicher stocked .308's.
My great uncle Guy was a gunsmith who built many rifles, mostly on Mauser actions from Rockisland Arsenal. Some he rebored, some he fabricated new barrels for, using truck axels for the blanks.
The .308's were commissioned by my uncle and my grandfather at the same time. My uncle had young eyes, so his has a fixed peep sight that's zeroed at 200 yards. Grandpa put on one of those new-fangled scopes...2.5 power.
For reasons that were never clear to me, Guy's wife hated his family, and when he died she sold all his guns to a broker before anyone could ask for one. She wouldn't even tell us which broker she sold them to.
Out of the six surviving guns he built, I have four of them. The two .308's, a 30-06, and a .243. Interesting side note, the .243 was his favorite elk gun.
A1Skinner wrote:Exactly! Haha. Although in full disclosure I've folded up around 10 buffalo with 1 shot each from my 243... I love that rifle. But I pack my 45/70 or 338 Lapua mag for bear protection.albravo wrote:Pffft! Everybody knows you can't kill anything with a .243. That's why MAGNUMS were built!
Sent from my SM-G960W using Tapatalk
Haha. I guess I should reword that to say I carry my 45/70 for bear protection, unless I'm out hunting with my 338 Lapua, then I would use it if needed.Hammer wrote:A1Skinner wrote:Exactly! Haha. Although in full disclosure I've folded up around 10 buffalo with 1 shot each from my 243... I love that rifle. But I pack my 45/70 or 338 Lapua mag for bear protection.albravo wrote:Pffft! Everybody knows you can't kill anything with a .243. That's why MAGNUMS were built!
Sent from my SM-G960W using Tapatalk
You don't see many .338 Lapua's with iron sights...or is that for protection against bears that are a mile out?![]()
I think it's interesting that the Danish Sirius Sled Patrol, the military unit responsible for patrolling Greenland via dog sled in two-man teams, never found a need for anything more powerful than the 30-06 to protect themselves agains polar bears and musk ox, and they recently switched to the .308...both bolt guns, not semi-auto's. They did upgrade the the standard issue 9mm sidearm to the 10mm Glock 20, since polar bears are the only reason they even cary a side arm.
Polar bears probably have a different personality than brown bears, but they're just as big. Maybe someone should contact Denmark and let them know that their troops are under-gunned...
My guess is that the response, if there was one, would be an invitation to come teach them something about marksmanship, and if you can do that, then we'll talk about cartridges.
IdahoBushFlyin wrote:Hello. I am not a certified pilot ( yet ), but can certainly say, that you couldn't go wrong with a Mossberg .308. The rifle has a 3 round clip I believe, and is very accurate. It shoots up to 180 grain, and I'm not sure, but I think the low end is like 120-130 grain. Would it stop a charging grizzly at 10 yards? That depends on your aim. Also, it is not uncommon for ol' grizz to keep fighting after you shoot him. This has been the case even with .375 Rugers once in a while. That said, it is more about disabling his shoulders/front and hind legs when he's charging you. The .308, having excellent penetration and fps, would not have a problem doing that if you can place a bulls eye on the first time. I'm saying " if you can place a bulls eye on the first time ", because the Mossberg .308 is a bolt action, and a charging grizzly at 10 yards is gonna give you no more than about 3, maybe 4 seconds to stop him. For hunting, the .308 would not be my first choice for grizzly, but it will do great for deer, elk, and, if you can place a good shot, it can definently prove to be more than adequate on moose. A .300 Win Mag, and a good aim, would be my grizzly hunting recommendation. .300 Win Mag will also be excellent for moose hunting, provided you have good aim, but are quite a bit more kick than a .308.
.308s I think have about 18lbs of recoil, and .300 Win Mags have like 26. Than again, I would not take a .308 grizzly hunting if at all possible. In terms of deffense, you couldn't go wrong with a double action .357 Mag Ruger, and 125 grain bullets. Happy flying/shooting!
Goldinthecreek wrote:Im not sure there is much of anything that will stop a Big brown at ten yards.
Perhaps something in a Sherman or Caterpillar?
With heartbeats in the 8 beats per minute range it just takes them a while to realize they are dead or have a broken shoulder.
Goldinthecreek wrote:With heartbeats in the 8 beats per minute range it just takes them a while to realize they are dead or have a broken shoulder.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests