Backcountry Pilot • Photo thread: Ramp Mummies

Photo thread: Ramp Mummies

A general forum for anything related to flying the backcountry. Please check first if your new topic fits better into a more specific forum before posting.
332 postsPage 15 of 171 ... 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17

Re: Photo thread: Ramp Mummies

robw56 wrote:Late model 180's (not sure which year it started) have the big tail like a 185.


I think they were called the Skywagon II. I ogled a nice one a few years back at Crane Lake.

Image
Zzz offline
Janitorial Staff
User avatar
Posts: 2854
Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2004 11:09 pm
Location: northern
Aircraft: Swiveling desk chair
Half a century spent proving “it is better to be thought a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.”

Re: Photo thread: Ramp Mummies

Zzz wrote:
robw56 wrote:Late model 180's (not sure which year it started) have the big tail like a 185.


I think they were called the Skywagon II. I ogled a nice one a few years back at Crane Lake.

Image

I think anything '64 or newer, with a factory float kit had the bigger dorsal. Also had 3 side windows.
A1Skinner offline
Supporter
User avatar
Posts: 5186
Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2012 11:38 am
Location: Eaglesham
FindMeSpot URL: [url:1vzmrq4a]http://share.findmespot.com/shared/faces/viewspots.jsp?glId=0az97SSJm2Ky58iEMJLqgaAQvVxMnGp6G[/url:1vzmrq4a]
Aircraft: Cessna P206A, AT402/502/602

Photo thread: Ramp Mummies

A1Skinner wrote:
Zzz wrote:
robw56 wrote:Late model 180's (not sure which year it started) have the big tail like a 185.


I think they were called the Skywagon II. I ogled a nice one a few years back at Crane Lake.

Image

I think anything '64 or newer, with a factory float kit had the bigger dorsal. Also had 3 side windows.


According to this, which we have added to our knowledge base thanks to Mark Pilkington over at Stancil, it was 1975 before the 180 got the 185 vertical stabilizer and dorsal. Unless I read it wrong (I skimmed fast.)

https://www.backcountrypilot.org/knowle ... stinctions

I guess "Skywagon II" was a model with a particular options package, available in '78.
Zzz offline
Janitorial Staff
User avatar
Posts: 2854
Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2004 11:09 pm
Location: northern
Aircraft: Swiveling desk chair
Half a century spent proving “it is better to be thought a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.”

Re: Photo thread: Ramp Mummies

Zzz wrote:
A1Skinner wrote:
Zzz wrote:[quote="robw56"]Late model 180's (not sure which year it started) have the big tail like a 185.


I think they were called the Skywagon II. I ogled a nice one a few years back at Crane Lake.

Image

I think anything '64 or newer, with a factory float kit had the bigger dorsal. Also had 3 side windows.


According to this, which we have added to our knowledge base thanks to Mark Pilkington over at Stancil, it was 1975 before the 180 got the 185 vertical stabilizer and dorsal. Unless I read it wrong (I skimmed fast.)

https://www.backcountrypilot.org/knowle ... stinctions[/quote]
That is right. Sorry. It can be added to any 64 or newer model to take advantage of the kenmore gross weight increase STC.
A1Skinner offline
Supporter
User avatar
Posts: 5186
Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2012 11:38 am
Location: Eaglesham
FindMeSpot URL: [url:1vzmrq4a]http://share.findmespot.com/shared/faces/viewspots.jsp?glId=0az97SSJm2Ky58iEMJLqgaAQvVxMnGp6G[/url:1vzmrq4a]
Aircraft: Cessna P206A, AT402/502/602

Re: Photo thread: Ramp Mummies

Either way, the big tail sure looks badass. 8-)
Zzz offline
Janitorial Staff
User avatar
Posts: 2854
Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2004 11:09 pm
Location: northern
Aircraft: Swiveling desk chair
Half a century spent proving “it is better to be thought a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.”

Re: Photo thread: Ramp Mummies

The C180 got the third side window in 1964. I thought that after a certain year all the 180's had the big dorsal, but per the old Stancil website info sheet, starting in 1975 "the optional float plane kit includes the C185 vertical fin to the end of production".

Minus any obvious clues, like the "180" behind the aft-most window on this one, the way to tell the difference is that the 185 has a little scoop on the bottom of the lower cowl, right between the cowl flaps. I believe this is to provide cooling air for a fuel pump that's a part of the fuel injection system..
hotrod180 offline
Supporter
User avatar
Posts: 10534
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 11:47 pm
Location: Port Townsend, WA
Cessna Skywagon -- accept no substitute!

Re: Photo thread: Ramp Mummies

Looking at these different birds is kinda depressing. So much potential.

Its like locking a horse in a stable til he falls apart.
ShadowAviator offline
User avatar
Posts: 191
Joined: Thu Feb 20, 2014 3:30 pm
Location: Waldo
Aircraft: 1969 C-172K "Valor"
SERVICE CEILING -noun - The altitude at which the pilot starts smacking the dash, exclaiming, "CLIMB OL' GIRL CLIMB!"

Re: Photo thread: Ramp Mummies

the dorsal is only for certain floats, its how they got them approved for that particular airframe. Most 180/185 dont use a dorsal, however some like the amphib aerocets do require a dorsal on a 185
Slantbuggy offline
User avatar
Posts: 58
Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2015 7:33 am
Location: Bridgton

Re: Photo thread: Ramp Mummies

Slantbuggy wrote:the dorsal is only for certain floats, its how they got them approved for that particular airframe. Most 180/185 dont use a dorsal, however some like the amphib aerocets do require a dorsal on a 185


You mean the ventral fin? Wipline and aerocet floats require a small ventral fin on the belly while EDO floats do not.

Dorsal fin in the 180/185 is the small fillet section at the front of the vertical stabilizer.

For many years one could buy the sheet metal bits from Cessna to convert the small dorsal to the larger style, this was much cheaper than trying to source a larger stab for the higher gross weight.
Halestorm offline
Supporter
User avatar
Posts: 956
Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2011 9:11 pm
Location: SEA
Aircraft: C-182E Pponk

Re: Photo thread: Ramp Mummies

i am corrected yes the ventral. thanks for the terminology fix! haha
Slantbuggy offline
User avatar
Posts: 58
Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2015 7:33 am
Location: Bridgton

Re: Photo thread: Ramp Mummies

Halestorm wrote:
Slantbuggy wrote:the dorsal is only for certain floats, its how they got them approved for that particular airframe. Most 180/185 dont use a dorsal, however some like the amphib aerocets do require a dorsal on a 185


You mean the ventral fin? Wipline and aerocet floats require a small ventral fin on the belly while EDO floats do not.

Dorsal fin in the 180/185 is the small fillet section at the front of the vertical stabilizer.

For many years one could buy the sheet metal bits from Cessna to convert the small dorsal to the larger style, this was much cheaper than trying to source a larger stab for the higher gross weight.



I am assuming you are referring to cessnas? My M6 is on EDO 2440's and has a ventral fin...or dock knocker as we call it ( if you have one you know why)
Steelroamer offline
Supporter
User avatar
Posts: 119
Joined: Fri May 09, 2014 3:10 pm
Location: Kenora
FindMeSpot URL: https://maps.findmespot.com/s/D8VB
Aircraft: maule M6 on Floats

Re: Photo thread: Ramp Mummies

I have a soft spot for ramp rats. I've been heavily involved with saving and returning two back to the skies. First was a C-45 that sat derelict at Boeing Field for 10+ years. I was one of the lead mechanics and we spent 5 days working on it and flew it from WA to CA, then flew it to Oshkosh a year or two later to try to win (and succeeded) the dirty bird award. My wife (then girlfriend) headed up the art setup wherein we let the people of Airventure graffiti the plane all week. (And for those concerned about the blasphemy of graffiti all over a vintage twin beech, the paint was in terrible shape and we used water-based kids finger paint, so everything washed right off)
http://www.twinbeech.com/dirtybirdOSH09.htm


The second plane was a Lockheed PV-2 that sat for 18 years. Again I was one of the lead mechanics and we spent about 2 weeks going through the systems and replacing the carbs and we ferried it out. Full story here: http://warbirdinformationexchange.org/p ... =3&t=38160

Currently I'm the shop manager working on rebuilding a SBD-4 dauntless that was recovered from Lake Michigan in 1993 back to flying status. I guess that one isn't a ramp mummy so much as a lake mummy? Should be flying in the next few months for the first time since 1944 when it blew a cylinder and was ditched in the lake. We just completed slow speed taxi tests. I love to bring back the "too far gone!"
Podunkjr offline
Posts: 9
Joined: Wed May 18, 2016 3:49 pm
Location: Lodi

Re: Photo thread: Ramp Mummies

Awesome! Very interesting, thanks for sharing and please keep posting.
richpiney offline
Supporter
User avatar
Posts: 277
Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2011 3:55 am
Location: Montana

Re: Photo thread: Ramp Mummies

That sure looks like the P2V at the strip in Middletown. Often wondered it's story.
propeller26 offline
User avatar
Posts: 174
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2007 9:30 pm
Location: Redding, CA
Aircraft: Cessna 185 Skywagon

Re: Photo thread: Ramp Mummies

propeller26 wrote:That sure looks like the P2V at the strip in Middletown. Often wondered it's story.


That's definitely the strip near Middletown. I've always wanted to land there whenever I fly by. Good to see that PV-2 fly again!
robw56 offline
User avatar
Posts: 3263
Joined: Thu Jan 18, 2007 9:30 pm
Location: Ward
Aircraft: 1957 C-180A

Re: Photo thread: Ramp Mummies

Same PV-2 from Middletown. We flew it out in 2010. I played flight engineer on the flight out. Great fun! I'm the guy in the green shirt with my hand on the propeller in the group photo and the one sitting on the firewall removing the carburetor. Was a lot of hard work getting her flyable again, but a lot of fun as well!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Podunkjr offline
Posts: 9
Joined: Wed May 18, 2016 3:49 pm
Location: Lodi

Re: Photo thread: Ramp Mummies

The dauntless as recovered from Lake Michigan in the early 1990's.
ImageImage



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Podunkjr offline
Posts: 9
Joined: Wed May 18, 2016 3:49 pm
Location: Lodi

Re: Photo thread: Ramp Mummies

And as it sits right now nearly ready for its maiden flight
ImageImage


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Podunkjr offline
Posts: 9
Joined: Wed May 18, 2016 3:49 pm
Location: Lodi

Re: Photo thread: Ramp Mummies

Podunkjr wrote:And as it sits right now nearly ready for its maiden flight
ImageImage


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Wow. Looks great!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
AK Flyster offline
User avatar
Posts: 27
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 1:37 am
Location: Eagle River
Aircraft: Cessna 170B

Re: Photo thread: Ramp Mummies

It's a shame to see this Scout sitting out neglected at 32S, Ravalli County Airport in Hamilton, Mt.

The IA owner was in the process of restoring it, but passed away a couple of years ago, never having completed it. Not sure who owns it now. Would be neat if it was up flying around the Selway again someday, but for now at least it just has to look West and soak it in....

Image
richpiney offline
Supporter
User avatar
Posts: 277
Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2011 3:55 am
Location: Montana

DISPLAY OPTIONS

PreviousNext
332 postsPage 15 of 171 ... 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

Latest Features

Latest Knowledge Base