Backcountry Pilot • What's the deal with this turbine Beaver?

What's the deal with this turbine Beaver?

Technical and practical discussion about specific aircraft types such as Cessna 180, Maule M7, et al. Please read and search carefully before posting, as many popular topics have already been discussed.
31 postsPage 1 of 21, 2

What's the deal with this turbine Beaver?

Hanging in the pax terminal at PANC; why would such a valuable aircraft be a ceiling ornament?

Image
Zzz offline
Janitorial Staff
User avatar
Posts: 2854
Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2004 11:09 pm
Location: northern
Aircraft: Swiveling desk chair
Half a century spent proving “it is better to be thought a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.”

Re: What's the deal with this turbine Beaver?

6b0c35800.jpg
6b0c35800.jpg (46.85 KiB) Viewed 4845 times
Ummmmmmmmm, because it's ugly. And if left outside the other Beavers would make fun of it.



Gump
GumpAir offline
User avatar
Posts: 4557
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 9:14 am
Location: Lost somewhere in Nevada
Aircraft: Old Clunker

Re: What's the deal with this turbine Beaver?

Garrett powered, OAS owned or some other agency. Im sure MTV has the skinny on it. I remember seeing it for years around Lake Hood.

Kurt
G44 offline
Supporter
User avatar
Posts: 2093
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 10:46 am
Location: Michigan

Re: What's the deal with this turbine Beaver?

That is the aircraft we lightly referred to as "Pinocchio". It began life as a DHC-2 MK I Beaver, owned and operated by the US Fish & Wildlife Service in Alaska.

The aircraft maintenance division of FWS acquired several "free" Garrett TPE 331 turbine engines, brand new surplus from the military, supposedly spares for OV-10 Broncos. They installed two of those engines on a Grumman G-21 Goose, along with a LOT of other mods, and one of the engines on N754. For commonality of spares, the cowlings and engine installations for the Goose and Beaver were made identical, hence the long tight cowling on this airplane. If an engine swap was needed, easy to install a spare on either airplane, since they were configured the same.

N754 also had a number of other modifications, like: Wet wings, which held bunches of fuel, the front doors were removed, and lower windows were installed to facilitate visibility of the ground/water, the Bristol Aero model 4580 amphibious floats were taken to Kenmore, who installed a section in them to effectively make them much higher buoyancy, as well as a number of other more minor mods.

The airplane was never certificated after the mods were done....."Public Use Category" airplane, so no need for certification.

The original intent of the conversion was to use the airplane in the Arctic for long range wildlife survey work. Garrett engines aren't real happy starters in cold weather, however. In any case, the airplane wound up based in Juneau, AK for the remainder of it's operational life, and was used to conduct statewide waterfowl surveys by the Migratory Bird Management Division. The fellows who operated the airplane loved it, but it was an expensive airplane to operate and maintain.

When those gents retired, N754 was also retired, and loaned or given to the Lake Hood Aviation Museum. It's been parked outside their facility for several years. It migrated to the airport terminal in the last year.

The airplane was a remarkable performer, even at high weights. The engine was capable of a thousand hp or so, but limited to ~ 750 for normal ops. And, it carried a lot of gas, so range was good. Gross weight was increased with the typical Beaver GW mods.

Interesting airplane. Some argued the only reason it could fly was because the earth repelled it, it was so ugly.

The Aleutian Goose, which was the nickname for the turbine converted Goose, was actually certificated many years ago, and was eventually sold to a private owner. A couple of owners down the line managed to lose control of it on takeoff in North Africa and was killed in the subsequent accident. That airplane was destroyed in that accident.

I've flown in both airplanes, and both were remarkable in many ways. Performance was pretty spectacular, at least in climb....

MTV
mtv offline
Knowledge Base Author
User avatar
Posts: 10514
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 1:47 am
Location: Bozeman

Re: What's the deal with this turbine Beaver?

Somehow I thought you might know. Thanks!
Zzz offline
Janitorial Staff
User avatar
Posts: 2854
Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2004 11:09 pm
Location: northern
Aircraft: Swiveling desk chair
Half a century spent proving “it is better to be thought a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.”

Re: What's the deal with this turbine Beaver?

Mike, I heard from another gentleman that flew Pinocchio that if you added power too quickly in the right configuration, the engine could torque roll the entire aircraft...

...was he exaggerating?...
Troy Hamon offline
User avatar
Posts: 913
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:27 am
Location: King Salmon
FindMeSpot URL: http://share.findmespot.com/shared/face ... 04iX0FXjV2
Aircraft: Piper PA-22

Re: What's the deal with this turbine Beaver?

IIRC early OV-10's had -6's (750 +/- shp), so not significantly different hp than the typical PT6 variants you see running around, I think the Viking's are running -34's at 680-750 SHP. but later OV-10's had -10's (940-100 shp), That would be quite a step up for the guy used to the average R-985's 450 SHP :mrgreen:

Incidentally, someone boo-boo'd the shut down on the ramp shot.... It appears to have missed the locks.

Take care, Rob
Rob offline
Supporter
User avatar
Posts: 1569
Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 10:34 am

Re: What's the deal with this turbine Beaver?

Troy Hamon wrote:Mike, I heard from another gentleman that flew Pinocchio that if you added power too quickly in the right configuration, the engine could torque roll the entire aircraft...

...was he exaggerating?...


Jim King and I departed ANC for Kodiak, with light fuel, and were cleared for departure on 32. Tower asked for expedited climb. Jim just smiled, pulled with the left hand, pushed with the right.

We cleared 8K before passing the shoreline. Pretty impressive, and not max power. I have little doubt it could torque roll, on wheels anyway. Lotsa mass in those floats.

And, yes, Rob, this was the later engine. Buckets of power. And the Goose had two of them.

MTV
mtv offline
Knowledge Base Author
User avatar
Posts: 10514
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 1:47 am
Location: Bozeman

Re: What's the deal with this turbine Beaver?

Firstly, I’ve not had an opportunity to meet MTV, and ply him with beverages to hear more stories. Yet?
Man, you oughta write a book Sir.
Maybe Zzz could convince a fistful of the Giants of the site to do sometype of collaboration type deal?
Seriously, I’d pay for copy.
Rereading Sheldon et al is great, but,
We’ve got these guys HERE!!
Seems like it’s worthy to get on paper.
Chazdevil offline
Posts: 94
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2011 6:46 pm
Location: Edmonds

Re: What's the deal with this turbine Beaver?

Chazdevil wrote:Firstly, I’ve not had an opportunity to meet MTV, and ply him with beverages to hear more stories. Yet?
Man, you oughta write a book Sir.
Maybe Zzz could convince a fistful of the Giants of the site to do sometype of collaboration type deal?
Seriously, I’d pay for copy.
Rereading Sheldon et al is great, but,
We’ve got these guys HERE!!
Seems like it’s worthy to get on paper.


I like that idea. Do the kids still buy real books?
Zzz offline
Janitorial Staff
User avatar
Posts: 2854
Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2004 11:09 pm
Location: northern
Aircraft: Swiveling desk chair
Half a century spent proving “it is better to be thought a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.”

Re: What's the deal with this turbine Beaver?

The "kids" that play here sure do, I'm always looking for fresh library additions.

Cheers,

Mapleflt
Mapleflt offline
Supporter
User avatar
Posts: 2324
Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2017 2:35 pm
Location: Bradford
Aircraft: Cessna S170B NexGen (NM) Variant

Re: What's the deal with this turbine Beaver?

Zzz wrote:
Chazdevil wrote:Firstly, I’ve not had an opportunity to meet MTV, and ply him with beverages to hear more stories. Yet?
Man, you oughta write a book Sir.
Maybe Zzz could convince a fistful of the Giants of the site to do sometype of collaboration type deal?
Seriously, I’d pay for copy.
Rereading Sheldon et al is great, but,
We’ve got these guys HERE!!
Seems like it’s worthy to get on paper.


I like that idea. Do the kids still buy real books?

Funny, the only people I know that read off of the iPad or Kindle are my wife and my parents! My kids read tons of REAL books. They're 12yo and 14yo. Maybe there's hope yet! LOL

CW
clippwagon offline
User avatar
Posts: 737
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2011 9:49 pm
Location: Oregon

Re: What's the deal with this turbine Beaver?

A bit late coming to this thread but there was a Garret conversion in Australia in the 70's, a lot better looking conversion than the one quoted here.
https://www.dhc-2.com/id440.htm
Oldfart offline
User avatar
Posts: 38
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2020 8:40 pm
Location: Casterton
Aircraft: C172D

Re: What's the deal with this turbine Beaver?

Oldfart wrote:A bit late coming to this thread but there was a Garret conversion in Australia in the 70's, a lot better looking conversion than the one quoted here.
https://www.dhc-2.com/id440.htm


That’s actually a MK III Turbo Beaver that’s been converted to a Garrett. Looks like a homemade vertical fin as well, which has a lot more area. A good thing with that much torque.

MTV
mtv offline
Knowledge Base Author
User avatar
Posts: 10514
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 1:47 am
Location: Bozeman

Re: What's the deal with this turbine Beaver?

Because the electric one would be more suited to perform as an ornament but had not yet been invented.

:lol:
Mountain Doctor offline
User avatar
Posts: 641
Joined: Fri May 01, 2015 3:33 pm
Location: Richland
Aircraft: Maule MXT-7 180A

Re: What's the deal with this turbine Beaver?

mtv wrote:

…. Looks like a homemade vertical fin as well, which has a lot more area. A good thing with that much torque.


Looks like the tail on a Found Bushhawk.
hotrod180 offline
Supporter
User avatar
Posts: 10534
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 11:47 pm
Location: Port Townsend, WA
Cessna Skywagon -- accept no substitute!

Re: What's the deal with this turbine Beaver?

It would seem the aircraft was imported into Australia in 1960, probably by Aerial Agriculture PTY Ltd who at one stage had around 50 Beavers on agricultural, topdressing operations. It was at that stage a standard 985 powered Beaver.
About 1968 or 69 it was converted to a "one off" turbine Beaver by SWP Engineering in Sydney. The dates of topdressing photos are a bit confusing if they are correct because some photos show it as radial powered in 1975?
scott185 offline
User avatar
Posts: 37
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2013 2:01 am
Location: christchurch

Re: What's the deal with this turbine Beaver?

If we are going for looks!
58C87845-31AA-47B2-A524-3438AB0FC1DE.jpeg
58C87845-31AA-47B2-A524-3438AB0FC1DE.jpeg (339.97 KiB) Viewed 3506 times
Terry offline
User avatar
Posts: 1365
Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2007 9:11 pm
Location: Willamette Valley
FindMeSpot URL: http://share.findmespot.com/shared/face ... 4GzPHI6t1d

Re: What's the deal with this turbine Beaver?

It was made as a radial then converted by Tom Watson at Aerial Agriculture. Because of problems with the regulating body it was the only one converted. They changed it back to a normal radial and it went back to work on topdressing operations. AAX was changed back to it's turbine configuration in the mid 80's. It was entirely designed and built in Bankstown.
Oldfart offline
User avatar
Posts: 38
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2020 8:40 pm
Location: Casterton
Aircraft: C172D

Re: What's the deal with this turbine Beaver?

Terry wrote:If we are going for looks!


That mk3 has been kicking around Seattle for years, affectionately known in certain circles as the “Hairy Legs” beaver. Most of us in that circle would never refer to that paint scheme as attractive.

It was re-engined years ago by Gene Zirkel and using a PT-6-27 and branded the “Magnum Beaver”. With that engine it was most likely temp limited on the day it’s photo was taken there in Roche Harbor. Always fun bouncing around in there with all the boat wakes in summertime.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Halestorm offline
Supporter
User avatar
Posts: 956
Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2011 9:11 pm
Location: SEA
Aircraft: C-182E Pponk

DISPLAY OPTIONS

Next
31 postsPage 1 of 21, 2

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

Latest Features

Latest Knowledge Base