Jaerl,
The fuel handling guys we worked with concluded that essentially nothing one could do with a plastic can would eliminate (at least to a reasonable level) the potential (pun intended) for a static problem fueling airplanes from plastic cans. They experimented with a section of hardware cloth INSIDE the can, with a section of hardware cloth bonded to the OUTSIDE of the can, with these pieces of metal clipped via wire to the fuel filler neck. There was still substantial residual static charge residing on the plastic can.
Point is, all these things may help a bit, but you have to understand the problem, which most users of plastic cans simply refuse to recognize: Plastic is an INSULATOR, not a conductor. There is a cable which connects the computer you're working on to a wall socket, presumably, right? What material is used to cover that cable, to insulate it from it's ground wire, and from your hand, so that you don't experience 110 v stimulation?? Plastic of one kind or another. That plastic can is also an insulator.
Now, in addition to being an insulator, plastic is a GREAT little material for STORING a static charge. We all remember the high school physics experiments where we rubbed our feet on a carpet, then touched the cute little blonde on the ear, arcing a spark to her petite little ear, and eliciting a squeal of delight in response to our cleverness, neh? That plastic can will build a charge quite well, from being moved through the air, on the ground, etc, etc.
Now, put the plastic can on top of your metal wing. Maybe a little bit of the static charge will dissipate, and that's not a bad idea, BUT, remember--plastic is an insulator. So, the static charge on much of the can remains.
Now, you start to pour fuel into the fuel filler. As someone noted earlier, fuel isn't a very good conductor either. Fuel sloshes around quite a lot as it pours. Remember our scheme for creating static to zap the blonde?? Moving our feet on carpet... Fuel moving inside that can helps to create a static charge.
If conditions are right, and the charge achieves a sufficient level, a spark can arc over from can to filler neck. That almost certainly will ignite the fuel vapors circulating around that filler, and you've got a fire that you are NOT going to extinguish.
And, folks, stop talking about GROUNDING. We don't GROUND an airplane when we connect the wire to the gas supply to fuel. We BOND the plane to the fuel container. And, that's what we need to do with a fuel can.
Look, I've fueled from five gallon plastic cans in past. I've always been as careful as possible when doing it, but I've also always assumed that I might get unlucky doing so. I don't use plastic cans any more unless there is simply no other way to get gas into the tank.
A friend who had a C170 with small tanks fabricated a set of aluminum fuel cans (four of them) for his plane. He was a hobby welder, and he used a mig welder to make cans that would fit in his float lockers. This was his primary goal, because the float lockers had small hatches, and none of the commercially available 5 gallon cans fit. His cans were a work of art. He used hardware store fittings for a spout and vent, and the things were as light as plastic. He glued some rubber onto the bottoms to protect the float lockers from sharp edges. Each can had a bonding cable, which he connected PRIOR to fueling. These things were simple, and according to him, weren't that hard to make.
And, I agree with James, the current crop of plastic cans make the problems worse, not better. They are so crappy as to be ridiculous in my opinion.
Again, you might get away with fueling from plastic cans for decades, and you can fool yourself thinking that you can dissipate the static charge on a plastic can, but there are folks out there who've lost airplnaes and people who've been hurt fueling from plastic cans. It's a crap shoot. Roll the dice.
MTV